Has anyone seen the 52 Mantle BVG 8 (Goodwin)?

[97manoftroy]

The back of the card toning I agree has some issues as well as a possible trimming of the card. There's a reason it's not in a PSA holder

[ullmandds]

I think what D MArvin meant to say was..."there's a reason it's not in an sgc holder!" If it were in a psa holder...It'd likely still be trimmed/altered.

[97manoftroy]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

I think what D MArvin meant to say was..."there's a reason it's not in an sgc holder!" If it were in a psa holder...It'd likely still be trimmed/altered.

Great point!

[markf31]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

I think what D MArvin meant to say was..."there's a reason it's not in an sgc holder!" If it were in a psa holder...It'd likely still be trimmed/altered.

If its trimmed/altered then the holder doesn't...oh, I see what you did there!

[CMIZ5290]

I have looked at blown up scans, and this grade is really perplexing. Having said that, I have had a few beckett graded T206s and had pretty good luck with them price wise....

[oldjudge]

To me card looks stained and I too wonder about the borders. Look at the lower right corner of the back and tell me what you think.

[ullmandds]

The corners on lot #57...green cobby aren't exactly confidence inspiring to me either?!?!?

http://www.goodwinandco.com/T206-Swe...-LOT25820.aspx

[GoldenAge50s]

The card sure looks to me like it has come in contact w/ something greasy OR has been subject to some kind of a "cleaning" agent. I don't think the scan settings have anything to do w/ the way it looks.

[WhenItWasAHobby]

I do know that at the 2000 National in Anaheim a collector submitted a high-end 1952 Topps Mantle to PSA for on-site grade and they rejected it for "Evidence of Trimming". The same collector then submitted it to Beckett on-site and it graded BVG 7 or 8? Now I'm not even sure which grade since it was so long ago. Whether this is the same Mantle I have no idea.