![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also comes with and without a blob
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Nash, Day and Northrup are all listed in SCD as variations....I have seen the less populated versions of each of these cards sell for a slight premium on ebay.
Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 09-26-2013 at 08:48 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure if it's recognized in the Price Guides, but '71 Carl Morton is extremely tough to find without the ugly black line at the top.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I view the Morton and these others as unintentional print defects, but I still collect them
![]() ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted wrong Hiatt
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No question, but because these defects were corrected, I think they are legit variations. Not unlike the 57 Bakep or 58 Herrer cards.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have them, and the Campos, but view them all as unintentional print defects, not true variations. But I realize the hobby has recognized the Herrer, Campos and Bakep as variations ( and, amazingly, the 61 Fairly green smudge on the back), and that's fine with me. I collect variants of any ilk.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a legit variation?? | Harliduck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-20-2013 01:01 PM |
Is the Nodgrass considered a legit variation? | Piratedogcardshows | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-12-2012 05:25 AM |
T206 Dahlen No Red - Legit Variation? | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-28-2010 09:36 PM |
Legit? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-02-2009 12:56 PM |
Does it look legit?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-19-2002 01:40 PM |