|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Max. Open threads per BST category should be- | |||
| Leave it as is, which means unlimited |
|
32 | 14.88% |
| Limit of 1 open per BST category |
|
12 | 5.58% |
| Limit of 2 open per BST category |
|
77 | 35.81% |
| Limit of 3 open per BST category |
|
43 | 20.00% |
| Limit of 4 open per BST category |
|
10 | 4.65% |
I don't care.
|
|
41 | 19.07% |
| Voters: 215. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim,
The PM system on 54 can be unstable at times. I understand why people post that they've sent a PM. I've done it at least once and had the seller reply that he had not received my PM (I think he eventually received it -- the next day). Edited to add: All of this boils down to character. On the surface a rule saying a thread can be bumped only if the seller lowers a price sounds good. But it's pretty obvious that there are sellers who start at a ridiculously high price so they can "bump for price reduction" the next day .. and the next ... and the next .. and the next. Go browse old B/S/T posts, and examples of this will quickly become apparent. Any rule can be skirted by someone who thinks the B/S/T is his personal flea market or Pawn Stars set. If you have people whose only goal is to try to get over on someone, rules are pretty worthless. If you have good people, most rules aren't needed. Last edited by Rob D.; 10-13-2013 at 11:04 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Our hosting company has had to restart the mail service several times, especially when they clear out old files (when I post about board hiccups or slowness is generally when it's happened). Also, unsubscribing from the auction emails that are sent out has caused a few not to receive PMs.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just a general question...How do most of you read Net54?
I have Net54 bookmarked to the main page. When I log on I hit New Posts and look through the threads. I ignore what I don't want to read and when I am done I go to quick links and hit Mark Forums Read. I find this way to be efficient and having lots of threads doesn't really bother me. Do other people use Net54 differently? Jeff |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think there is a huge problem currently.... Maybe you should go on a case by case basis when someone has ten threads they are bumping daily in one single section... I've seen it happen...
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I feel like one for each of the individual B/S/T threads would be perfect.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Im sure I've missed it somewhere, but I think it would be very beneficial if there was a separate "Wanted" section. That will eliminate the WTB posts in the B/S/T section and ultimately have a smoother section to sell your items. Then you could click on the "Wanted" section and scroll down to see if you have what someone is looking for. Way easier..
Mixing the wanted and the selling portions all together can partially clog the section and will help those that only look to buy anyways. Not saying it's really bad right now, just might be helpful..
__________________
Always Buying game used BATS A portion of my collection on GUA: https://gameusedauthority.com/all-co...member_id=pUnl Last edited by UnVme7; 10-13-2013 at 01:03 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| why so many threads? | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-08-2013 06:56 AM |
| 10 threads? | thehoodedcoder | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 06-04-2013 06:05 PM |
| Robert Edward Auction Open for View 2013 Open | joeadcock | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 04-16-2013 12:23 PM |
| To Open or Not to Open....that is the question - '58 Topps Rack Packs | bryanshaw | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 18 | 03-15-2011 09:01 PM |
| ***** Threads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-02-2002 09:11 PM |