![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also 10 years ago there was a ton of friction between memorabilia and card only collectors. There was a fellow named Robert Plancich who was really hitting Mastro and Dave Bushing hard on game used bats...some of that discussion was overtaking the board and caused a lot of fighting.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would say the differences are only subtle. I still miss the halcyon days of basic text messaging, where you didn't have as much "noise" between each post. And the site was a lot less commercial.
In terms of substance, I have found that I drift from the threads more than I used to. How many times can I read about the different nuances of T206s? Still, I do think we need a good "F. Scott Fitzgerald" post every six months or so. A while ago I went into the ancient archives and started bumping certain threads to the top. I thought it was awesome to engage for the first time on some topics that hadn't been addressed in a really long time. I think I went overboard, and got a slap down from the benevolent moderator. But, there is something to be said for the notion that we get a lot of repeat business on some boring topics, and other amazing topics get under-noticed. Also, as the regular contributors start to "green", you get a lot of dis-interest in topics that have been beaten to death. All-in-all, I haven't noticed too much of a change. Like I said, it's been subtle.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2 more big differences from 10 years ago:
1) BarryS used to correct spelling and grammar errors for everybody so we could look more intelligent 2) More women used to contribute (Joanne, Julie, etc) Times change. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is that we HAVE to ID ourselves if we participate in controversial threads. In my opinion, that makes us take responsbility for what we do or say.
Since unlike other boards, we don't have threads removed for the heck of it -- that makes for a more intelligent discussion basis Rich |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It did not go over too well Dave, so I stopped. I am not sure many people care about spelling any more.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I do Barry...I do!!!!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So do I. It is a personal preference, I suppose.
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am also concerned with spelling and grammar. Dave.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Barry, did you correct grammar in addition to spelling errors? It seems like that would be a full-time job.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did Chris, and it was a thankless task. My contention is if you want people to read your posts, please write clearly. There are so many posts I read that I have no idea what I am reading. Simple sentences go a long way.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do you mean that you read so many posts that you get confused, or do you mean that you read many confusing posts?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1 card from each post war decade | robsbessette | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 11-26-2012 07:12 PM |
What is your favorite set from each decade? | zljones | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 01-26-2012 12:26 PM |
Net54 Fantasy League Forum ? Nixing the Golf Forum? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 02-17-2009 11:16 AM |
Most Important Cards of Each Decade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 04-19-2006 03:16 PM |
players most famous by decade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 02-02-2005 02:41 PM |