T206 Wagner partial back. Really Huggins & Scott?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

My point is that since no part of a Wagner front shows up on the Bowerman, any proof or theories regarding sheet placement will always be speculative. Moreover, even if you proved with 100% certainty that this card once shared a sheet with Wagner, and the Wagner would have been on the front of the card next door, you still do not have a piece of a Wagner because none of its front shows up.
It is purely a ruse.

+1
Isn't it ironic that this consignor got this card from the T206 Museum. It appears Patrick Chan was selling this card as a simple Bowerman, not a "partial Wagner." Even Chan had more integrity than to try that.
And yes, using Patrick Chan and integrity in the same sentence is a first for me.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Sean

+1
Isn't it ironic that this consignor got this card from the T206 Museum. It appears Patrick Chan was selling this card as a simple Bowerman, not a "partial Wagner." Even Chan had more integrity than to try that.
And yes, using Patrick Chan and integrity in the same sentence is a first for me.

+1 and very funny.

[hugginsandscott]

After being made aware of some additional information regarding Piedmont backed Wagner's, we, along with the consignor, have opted to pull the card from the auction.

Thanks,
Huggins and Scott Auctions

[ullmandds]

let the love fest begin!

[t206hound]

H&S pulled their card, but check out what Joe's Vintage has to offer:
http://jvscauctions.com/LotDetail.aspx?inventoryid=5904

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by t206hound

H&S pulled their card, but check out what Joe's Vintage has to offer:
http://jvscauctions.com/LotDetail.aspx?inventoryid=5904

Classic. Title alone makes it deserving of a bid.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

Classic. Title alone makes it deserving of a bid.

Laugh, but some of the white cardboard on the back of that Bowerman could actually be part of a Wagner.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

Classic. Title alone makes it deserving of a bid.

+1

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

Classic. Title alone makes it deserving of a bid.

+1 Hilarious!

[WhenItWasAHobby]

Originally Posted by hugginsandscott

After being made aware of some additional information regarding Piedmont backed Wagner's, we, along with the consignor, have opted to pull the card from the auction.

Thanks,
Huggins and Scott Auctions

[ZachS]

Well I hope you guys are happy. I was prepared to go as high as necessary to get that card and now it's gone.

Thanks, jerks.