|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have probably submitted more cards for crossover to SGC than anyone on this board. I have been successful in crossing cards from old holders. However, the SGC guarantee does not apply to cards in old holders.
When you submit a card in an old SGC holder, it will be treated like a card that has been graded by another company. While SGC does not guarantee cards in old holders, they may, on rare occasions, buy the card back or reholder it at a lower grade and pay the difference. However, that is because they do not want a badly misgraded card floating around. Now Kevin knows all this already. I would not normally comment on a card that someone is selling in the BST section. However, Kevin constantly uses the main forum to advance his agenda in the BST. Because cards in old SGC holders do not carry the guarantee, they sell for less. Because they sell for less, it is assumed by savvy buyers that the seller has already tried to cross the card to a new holder. Or, in Kevin's case, since PSA cards sell for so much more, it is assumed he tried to cross the Cy Young into a PSA holder. Why wouldn't he?
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold Last edited by RGold; 12-26-2013 at 08:45 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
When I am buying or obtaining a card I generally look at the card more than I do the age of the holder. Now, if a card is in a high grade GAI holder, then I run the other way (some might be good, a lot aren't). But for SGC or PSA, old or new holders aren't a big deal to me. I have crossed one card I remember, an N284 SGC 92 King Kelly. It crossed from a very old SGC holder to a new one with the same number. That was maybe 5-6 yrs ago....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As for commenting on other members cards mainly in terms of picking apart their grades I think it’s a weak thing to do so I avoid. However since Kevin asked directly about his Young card while it’s a real beauty I don’t think that card would become an 86 today based upon the scans provided on the BST. I think it would be more in the 82-84 at best range based on my experience with SGC which is now well over 2k graded SGC cards. Not a shot at Kevin because the card is very nice I’d love to own it. I too am shocked Kevin hasn't moved this to a PSA holder he has made a big point of saying money for cards is left on the table unless they are in PSA holders.... Last edited by wonkaticket; 12-27-2013 at 03:32 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
i had a "SG" t206 speaker 60 that came back trimmed many years ago, so yes personally i treat them the same as GAI holder...and i'd rather buy a raw card than a GAI card.
derek's gold sticker SGC grades are the toughest! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Never much love for GAI cards I have plenty of really beautiful caramel cards graded in GAI holders from back in the day when GAI was just as strict as SGC. Granted that time has long passed but there was a time when GAI graded cards were very credible. P.S. I haven't had a card graded by GAI now in 6-7 years.... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
agreed tbob, if i'm buying GAI the safest ones would be the "First Graded" labels. you can be certain those were the earliest GAI stuff.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
1st gen GAI can also be iffy because alot of their business came from the $2.50 pre-grade at shows where they looked at the card under a yellow lamp for 10-15sec and assign a grade to it (if you like the grade it costs an additional $5-$10 for slabbing back at their HQ). i suspect lots of altered stuff passed through this way.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 12-27-2013 at 08:03 PM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for all the information everyone, and the entertainment as well.
__________________
T206 Collection Completion: 130/524 Hall of Fame T206's: ?/76 Back Run: 30/37 (81% Complete) Schlei (Catching) Back run: 10/12 (minus blank back) Actively collecting t206 Hall of Famers, Southern Leaguers, and Various backs in good to excellent condition. Love talking cards too. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wazoo- You may just be a kid, but you definitely know how to stir the pot...You should fit right in...
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hahahah, hey it was just a question!
__________________
T206 Collection Completion: 130/524 Hall of Fame T206's: ?/76 Back Run: 30/37 (81% Complete) Schlei (Catching) Back run: 10/12 (minus blank back) Actively collecting t206 Hall of Famers, Southern Leaguers, and Various backs in good to excellent condition. Love talking cards too. Last edited by wazoo; 12-27-2013 at 08:26 PM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah Waz, way to "bump" the thread.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 12:54 PM |
| Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 05:12 PM |
| Mastro 0% on PSA Cards Valued Over $1000 - Why? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-16-2008 07:46 PM |
| D303 - under appreciated and valued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-08-2003 04:33 PM |
| Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 12:13 PM |