|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I try to start by looking at the qualities of the photo and mount first, then key on the other stuff as support for my first gut reaction - you don't want a bib, ring bat or pillbox hat clouding your judgement. Attaching an age to an old photos is often based on a lot of stuff going on in your brain at a less conscious level - hard to put your finger on it, but you have a gut feel based on the sum of all the knowledge you've accumulated and pieces you've seen. When I see people assertively state that something's from say, 1880, and I have a strong feeling that it's more like 1900, I should probably just keep my opinion to myself - without 'proof', it's all just one collector's knowledge and experience vs another's. I do remember getting bamboozled by a mount that I was certain was circa 1905, and then I found one from the 1890's in my own collection that could be definitively dated to that period. There are always opportunities to learn.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If I had to pick a decade, I'd pick 1870s. It looks 1870s. The photo style and uniforms are 1870s-stye, which of course doesn't mean it couldn't be say 1880 or 1881.
Last edited by drcy; 02-20-2014 at 12:01 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll say 1880-85.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dark shoes are post 1870s style, but they could be wearing work shoes to the studio and the guy in the right back appears to possibly be wearing the 1870s style. The shoes are the only troublesome detail for me. If they were wearing white shoes, they'd I'd be more more firm that it's 1870s. The general rule of thumb is white hightop shoes (with black trim) are 1860s-70s and black/dark brown athletic shoes are 1880-90s. Dark low tops 20th century. The problem is sometimes the players wore their work or dress shoes or are only in their stocking feet as they're in the photography studio-- but they usually wear their athletic shoes because its part of their uniform.
The guy on the front left is wearing dark shoes, but they look like slip on non-athletic shoes. Official athletic shoes were lace up. And it looks as if the shoes on the right front are also not lace up. And, as I said, the guy in the right back appears to be wearing 1870s baseball shoes. So the shoes are the tough part. As I said, it could be be early 1880s, but my pick of a decade is still 1870s. Clearly, December 31 1879 and January 1st 1880 weren't far apart, which is why there is a margin of error, or allowances made, when picking a decade. That's why the word 'circa' was invented. Last edited by drcy; 02-20-2014 at 12:27 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The guy at front left is wearing a fairly definitive style of shoe - perhaps someone can date them?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
As long as you don't see a Nike logo under magnification.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I add that the overall photo style (mount, etc) is a standard 1870s style, which, again, doesn't mean it could have overlapped into say 1880.
Last edited by drcy; 02-20-2014 at 12:49 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB 1870s-1890s Baseball Bat | ruth-gehrig | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 6 | 02-15-2014 06:55 AM |
| Photographer???? Need help | Marckus99 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 09-14-2012 03:53 PM |
| Which pre-war photographer do you like best? | thekingofclout | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 32 | 09-13-2012 10:38 AM |
| Which post-war photographer do you like best? | thekingofclout | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 17 | 09-29-2009 01:45 PM |
| Late 1860s to Early 1870s Tintype For Sale | packs | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-06-2009 12:57 PM |