t206 vs 1988 topps... yeah you read that right!

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by poorlydrawncat

Here's two problems I see with this line of reasoning: distribution and ephemera status.

The T206 set was distributed as singles and were secondary to the cigarettes. Pure ephemera. Many were immediately taken out of circulation when the pack was thrown away. I have a feeling most non-surviving T206s were destroyed in the first 25 years of their existence.

1988 Topps were distributed in large numbers (sets, packs, etc) and the people who bought them were buying the cards as collectables, not the gum. There are still millions of sealed sets sitting in people's garages. Even if they are considered worthless, they will not be thrown away because they are no longer ephemera. Even if they are worthless you will be hard pressed to convince someone that they are LITERALLY trash, on the level of an empty cigarette pack.

BUT WHO KNOWS. My grandchildren might be in for a big payday someday... Definitely interesting to consider.

I do see the differences but again will anyone past our generation care? Our offspring won't want to deal with them. We hold on to them because of the original collectible value, our offspring won't. My Grandparents were collectors of certain things yet when my Grandpa passed away my aunts and uncles pitched a lot of it. Then when, recently, my Grandma went to a retirement home she couldn't take most of it and my Aunts and Uncles tossed the remaining bits. I was lucky enough to find a box with some rubber-banded baseball cards years prior to this cleansing and they were saved, but the other collectibles were pitched minus a few nostalgic pieces.


The t206s may not have made it past the first 25 years, but if 88 topps arent going to make it past 75 years. Maybe it isn't in 100 years, but what about in 150 years? Just a thought. Another thought would be what about instead of 88 topps cards you compared it to cards that were distributed by other means like cracker jack prize cards that were distributed in the early 90s? Or cereal box cards, or Denny's cards. Do these cards have a place in the future (not our futures, but several generations down the road)?

[CardTarget]

The other issue you have is that 1988 doesn't have ANY stars. It's the worst year for rookie cards in the last three decades. Even the stars of the day, like Mattingly, McGriff, Dwight Evans, etc won't have the same baseball stature in 100 years that Cobb, Matty, and Walter Johnson have today.

If the T206 set had no stars it wouldn't be collectable at all. It would be like the other hundreds of tobacco card sets of flowers and models and whatnot that were produced that really have little value.

[wolf441]

Originally Posted by CardTarget

The other issue you have is that 1988 doesn't have ANY stars. It's the worst year for rookie cards in the last three decades. Even the stars of the day, like Mattingly, McGriff, Dwight Evans, etc won't have the same baseball stature in 100 years that Cobb, Matty, and Walter Johnson have today.

If the T206 set had no stars it wouldn't be collectable at all. It would be like the other hundreds of tobacco card sets of flowers and models and whatnot that were produced that really have little value.

I'm glad you didn't lump 1987 in with your statement Mike, because clearly the rookie cards of Cory Snyder and Oddibe (young again) McDowell are poised to make the leap one of these years...

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by CardTarget

The other issue you have is that 1988 doesn't have ANY stars. It's the worst year for rookie cards in the last three decades. Even the stars of the day, like Mattingly, McGriff, Dwight Evans, etc won't have the same baseball stature in 100 years that Cobb, Matty, and Walter Johnson have today.

If the T206 set had no stars it wouldn't be collectable at all. It would be like the other hundreds of tobacco card sets of flowers and models and whatnot that were produced that really have little value.

Good point. It really makes me think that the survival rate may even be lower than t206. The only real issue with the argument is the Southern League has its own following (some people collect just this subset) and those aren't the stars. So maybe we can compare the future to that of Obaks or Red Boarder Old Mill cards?

In the end this was just random thoughts I had about the abundance of t206s I see, and how I constantly hear that the 80s (particularly 88) was the start of mass producing sets.
Even going to shows and looking for prewar the prewar dealers have stacks and stacks of t206, but I don't see the same stacks of e90s or even t205s. I made the mistake of asking one of these dealers once where their stack of t205s where as they had 6 stacks of t206 cards among other prewar stacks. He looked at me puzzled and said "I don't know if I have any. I may have one somewhere."

[z28jd]

I think the problem with this line of thinking is that they also made lots of Donruss, Fleer, Score cards in 1988. They also made a lot of each in 1989 and 1990. It gets to the point, where people won't pay a lot for a specific common, because he can find 15 other cards for the same person. If you compare specific stars, the amount of different Ty Cobb cards available pales in comparison to someone like Tony Gwynn.

One other thing that supposedly took a lot of cards and such out of circulation, was a paper drive during WWII. I don't think we will see another paper drive like take cards out of the population.

I encourage people to destroy cards from this era though, for the benefit on others such as myself. I wouldn't mind seeing a shredder at the National shows, where people just shred commons from the 1987-1991 era. You don't need seven cards of Alvaro Espinoza, so get rid of six of them now!