|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sitting here with Dmitri Young and he thinks that card could get a 10, if he were to resubmit it..
Doug |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
o l |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buy the holder, not the card
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1. It does look to me like paper loss, which usually relegates a card to no better than fair, even if the paper loss is on the reverse (which neither I nor my '56 Kahn's Frank Robinson agrees with, by the way!). Eye appeal will often, if perhaps not consistently, trump technical grade. See the recent sale of the 1939 R303 Goudey Premium Ted Williams by Mike Wheat, which had been graded VG, due to light staining, but appeared near mint--$1,675.
Highest regards, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 04-15-2014 at 03:54 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Jantz |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
With the card either above or below it? I did not bother going to the verification on PSA website to check. I know this happend to me on 2 T206 cards and they fixed it for me.
|
![]() |
|
|