|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ball is lot 1053 in the current REA catalog...I am told as I haven't got mine yet...
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/kdixon |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very cool...be sure to post what it goes for!
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ball brought $1100. Feel like someone got a rare bargain. Really thought it would bring at least twice that much. I don't think it helped any that the catalog only had the ball pictured with out any description. Oh well.
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/kdixon |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just wondering why you thought it would go for twice that? It is an unusual style but 1300.+ with buyer's penalty is pretty strong. Actually very strong. In general even for something different from most - and getting the peeper's of them what's got money in a major auction like Edwards - exceeding 1000.00 is very significant. Seller should be very happy. All things being equal I figure it's a five or six hundred ball - a price point at which I am probably a buyer. Nice ball no matter what......
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would have thought 700 ,750. It is unusual. I think the seller did just fine..
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why did I think it would bring more? Had better offers two years ago at the national and was told by REA would do well, somewhere between 800 and several thousand . So they were right, but was hoping for a little more. I do think no description in the catalog didn't help any. Some weird balls in the past auctions did very well, but I am sure not a ball expert at all. Thanks to all for your posts on the ball.
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/kdixon |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
seeing a LP or belt style or even early figure 8 sell for over 2000. and while your ball was very nice I stand by my assessment. Several thousand dollars would be quite a stretch. The buyer paid over 1300. and it sold for 60% more than REA's low estimate to you - and that's not factoring in if there were any shipping or consignment penalties. Given the range REA suggested and sales history of similar items you did quite well. If you were offered more than the final sale price - been there and done that - when one rolls the dice there are many outcomes.....I absolutely agree that a description is a nessesary component of an auction listing (pretty obvious and someone dropped the ball if there wasn't one) but doubt it would have pushed what's basically an early "sandlot" ball any higher as generally those competing in the space don't come in blind. I'm happy for you even if you're not :-)
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why no description...
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| You've got to see this!!! "Medium" channels Babe Ruth and has him sign ball. ON EBAY! | BrandonG | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 35 | 02-09-2012 10:22 AM |
| FS: 1926 OAL Ball Yankees/Tigers Game Used - Pennock signed | rholmes | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 10-10-2010 10:58 AM |
| '55 Yankee Team Signed Ball - Mantle (ss), Stengel, E Howard, Berra, etc - 27 sigs PSA/DNA | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 3 | 07-06-2008 10:59 AM |
| Signed Ruth Ball question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 06-02-2008 11:12 PM |
| Thompson's 1951 HR ball | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-14-2005 02:37 PM |