 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
05-10-2014, 09:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I smell a potential lawsuit brewing. On a serious note.....I will take SGC over PSA any day of the week as far as service and prewar accuracy. If it were an SGC 84 I would better understand your frustration. The card is not ruined.
Last edited by JasonD08; 05-10-2014 at 09:55 AM. Reason: spelling 
|
|
#3
05-10-2014, 09:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Both PSA and SGC are staffed by pesky mortals who have their good days and their bad days when it comes to subjective grading. Buy the card.....not the holder still rings true.
Last edited by Orioles1954; 05-10-2014 at 09:58 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| O/T: Art restoration project gone horribly awry | BradH | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-27-2012 12:33 AM |
| A real disappointing conversation with PAYPAL... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-30-2008 09:06 PM |
| It could be disappointing to buy a card which is properly graded with the correct holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-15-2006 04:20 PM |
| disappointing moment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 03-11-2005 05:10 AM |
Hybrid Mode
