|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
More. I honestly do not think the percentage is a lot higher the problem lies with the same horribly graded cards continue to be flipped because someone buys the card and hates it so they sell. Plus SGC is honestly more willing to admit a mistake and buy the card back. That I agree with 100%.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I understand grading is subjective, but it's cards like the Cy Young that really confuse me. Everyone has their doubts about some grades, but the ones that no human on Earth should miss are the ones that anger me and make me question the company that grades them.
I know a lot of people go back and forth on PSA and SGC about their grades not being legitimate, but as long as they comply with their set grading standards, I don't see the problem (obvious hiccups do not apply ). Not every company goes by the same standards, so it is unfair to judge them to one universal list.I collect graded cards from the big three and do it based on appeal and not the grade, so there is no bias over here
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 Last edited by freakhappy; 07-05-2014 at 12:11 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paper loss on Front = PSA 6 | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 05-24-2012 06:16 AM |
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 07:34 PM |
| Flaking vs. paper loss | Orions father | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-13-2010 10:08 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 03:09 AM |
| Crease or paper loss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2003 08:10 PM |