 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
07-13-2014, 03:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Just back from vacation and catching up to more beautiful examples.. thank you to all posting.
Macullar/Maskrey misidentified - New example Maskrey in photo, Macullar listed - ball cropped out of photo (slight variant to 295-1) I am really getting a kick out of searching for OJs out there. Finding good and bad cards out there. 
|
|
#5
07-13-2014, 05:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jay,
If you're still following this thread I had a quick question - Where in the "OJ spectrum" of "hard to get" would you rate the Phenomenal Smith portrait card? How does this card rate in the order of "rarity" when compared to the spotted ties? Thanks!
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for.
|
|
#6
07-13-2014, 06:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Fred! The Phenominal Smith portrait is a very scarce card, as scarce or scarcer than most of the spotted ties, possibly with the exceptions of Behel and Brady. It is scarcer than all of the Connor, Gerhardt, Kelly, Welch, Esterbrook, Orr, and Lynch script cards (one Lynch script pose may be as scarce). Unfortunately, it also tends to come with a light photo.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
