|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since I have used the SCD Catalog as my want list and checklist for Topps and Fleer, which is what I collect, and since it uses 1980 as a cut off, like Bob, that is what I used for my first divider
Up until 1994 I collected every set or card or insert or test set listed for Topps in SCD. Because of the huge proliferation of products for Topps starting in 1994, I then cut back to just the main sets and any updates. I later expanded to include Heritage sets as well. So for just me personally, 1994 became my second cut off date |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I would love to have a way to keep track of my cards digitally in an online catalog...does SCD allow you to do this?
__________________
---- One families journey in card collecting, including the attempt to build a set of the most iconic baseball card set ever...1952 Topps! 2 down...405 to go! http://journeyto407.wordpress.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
double post...
Last edited by novakjr; 07-14-2014 at 01:52 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's some of those cutoffs don't work for me.
White cardstock --- Mid 60's and especially 68,69, and 70. and late 70's with basketball. Yeah, the thin stuff started in 93, but there was a lot of white stock earlier. Inserts? ---- Early 60's. Sort of stopped in 73-4 with the team checklists, but there were other inserts throughout the early 80's in certain packs. Shiny? - Much of what Topps makes isn't. (A+G, Gypsy Queen, most of heritage....) Even the base stuff isn't much different than 89 UD. So maybe 81 works as the year the competition began. (Of course ignoring 51-55 and 59-60) I see the cards as a continuing thing, each decade has it's "thing", and also for the most part some throwbacks and sets ahead of their time. Steve B |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was discussing this thread today with a co-worker and he suggested that "modern" began when gum was no longer included in the packs. While it was an off-the-cuff, lighthearted comment, maybe it makes sense.
__________________
Happy Collecting Ed |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
'73 is a nice debate, but it wasn't exclusively a single series release for everyone, as that appears to have been a test to see what they would do going forward. So I'd be more inclined to look at '74 as the first decidedly single release year.. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are these hockey cards worth anything? Modern stuff all "names" | Republicaninmass | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 3 | 03-09-2013 11:46 AM |
| Modern players with "neat" autographs | Sean1125 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 09-27-2012 10:32 PM |
| For Sale: "Modern" Oddball Cards of Pre-War Players | leftygrove10 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-16-2011 10:43 AM |
| O/T?What Modern Day Cards Will Become Well Sought After Once Becoming "Vintage"? | teetwoohsix | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 16 | 05-03-2010 02:55 PM |
| 1st childrens book on "modern" baseball | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 06-14-2007 02:52 PM |