t206 with no name

[atx840]

The chipping looks suspect, not sure SGC would label as no name.

I hope it's real for the buyer, good price if it is.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by atx840

The chipping looks suspect, not sure SGC would label as no name.

I hope it's real for the buyer, good price if it is.

You guys know more about T206 than I do but I agree about the bottom of the card looking suspect. However, I can't see erasure so who knows.... Good luck to the buyer....

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Deacon-Phill...vip=true&rt=nc



.

[mrvster]

I spotted this one immediately......someone is taking a big risk on it...

near IMPOSSIBLE to tell from the scan....99.9% of T206 "no namers" are really not authentic "no namers".... the only way to tell is black light , then loupe....

this card will have no validity unless slabbed! no name T206 are the easiest to alter I heard.....

if I could guess from scan......erasure/chipping suspect......


love to take bets on this..;I vote NOT

[t206hound]

I'm with you JV... that's why my max bid was around $90.

[ullmandds]

technically ebay protects the buyer if card is not as advertised?

[JohnP0621]

The Top of the card looks funny. It also looks trimmed. It looks Too straight compared to the rest of the borders. IMO

John P

[The Nasty Nati]

The risk outweighs the reward IMO. Maybe if a high res image was provided it wouldn't be as risky. My opinion, it's been altered.

[Mountaineer1999]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

technically ebay protects the buyer if card is not as advertised?

.....

[ullmandds]

Card is now in hand...here is a blown up scan of the area in question. Through illuminated magnification looks good to me. Card is not trimmed at top either...just heavily worn. Gloss and tone of bottom matches the rest of the border as well.

Any opinions...advice?