|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's also usually a drier process than direct lithography. Direct lithography is still used for art prints. Plate wear isn't usually a big deal if you're only doing a few hundred impressions (Or less) And a good manual printer can control the inking better especially if there's an area that's troublesome. Like the thin space between the frame lines of the Piedmont backs which are sometimes filled in because of the plate drying out a bit too much Steve B |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know much about lithography either but that seems to be a big process to use both stone and metal for one sheet of cards .
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's not usually both in production. More modern stuff except art is always metal plates.
But metal plates were fairly new in 1909-10, And a lot was still done using stones as the plates. Figuring out which was used is very hard. At the time a lot of the plates were laid out using transfers which were probably printed from stones. A lot of the stones that are still around have multiple items on them, like billheads from 3-4 different companies, or parts of labels from unrelated brands. Steve B |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
from my collection. Circa 1910's stone featuring tintags and believe it or not - images of Colgan's Chips containers. When they no longer used them - they sometimes would end up in fills and driveways! These later stones @ around 10" x 12" were easier to minipulate than the earlier ones - stones that were much "chunkier" and heavier. Utilizing multiple color passes would require multiple pressings - no easy task especially in lining up the correct scheme.
Last edited by 1880nonsports; 08-24-2014 at 09:43 AM. Reason: forgot pic :-) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just curious if you bought that stone at one of the Cleveland Nationals (2007 or 2009)?
Looks like the same stone I had the chance to buy and passed on. Wish I hadn't. Jantz |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
think it was 2007. Think I bought it from my friend Glenn. Getting it home on the plane was bitch as they said it could be a weapon and couldn't go as carry-on. Besides the fear of it breaking - my cargo bag was already at the weight limit and my flight about to take off.
I'm probably going to have it placed in a sort of iron armature or brace so that it can be safely stood upright and maybe even swivel. Of course I had the same thought 7 years ago and although it's moved once or twice - it remains in the same state as when I bought it. Reminds me of a quote I recently encountered here - Aesop - when all is said and done - more is said than done... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
ahhh 07
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lithography Stones Used As Building Blocks | toppcat | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-11-2014 07:52 PM |
| Stone lithography -only slightly OT | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-20-2011 01:15 PM |
| T206 Lithography | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-02-2010 04:03 PM |
| Please show your ghost overprints | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 11-01-2007 03:06 PM |
| Ghost Overprints | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-19-2006 05:27 PM |