Most rare 1914 CJ? - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:35 PM
btkpath's Avatar
btkpath btkpath is offline
Barry
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 291
Default

Well, seeing that everybody is showing their Pratt's…..

Granted the Cady is represented in both the 1914 and 1915 sets, but it is still numerically the least common 1914 CJ. Just sayin'……..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg #93 Del Pratt.jpg (77.8 KB, 361 views)
File Type: jpg #87 Forest Cady.jpg (75.2 KB, 361 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:50 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,528
Default

This is just turned into a show me your D*#@ I mean Pratt contest. haha
I wish I had one to whip out (like in real life it would be far below average). lol

seriously...anyone know why these are so expensive? So far the best reason is there's no same pose in 15's. Gotta be more to this....could it be that this card was hyped at one point and prices have stayed inflated from this false hype?


Quote:
Originally Posted by btkpath View Post
Well, seeing that everybody is showing their Pratt's…..

Granted the Cady is represented in both the 1914 and 1915 sets, but it is still numerically the least common 1914 CJ. Just sayin'……..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2014, 12:08 AM
btkpath's Avatar
btkpath btkpath is offline
Barry
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 291
Default

I had heard from a VERY reliable source at one time that the Pratt family bought up all the cards that they could find, and this source had sold the Pratt family several of the cards in the past. I know this was the case with other families of players' cards from other sets.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2014, 07:49 AM
GregMitch34's Avatar
GregMitch34 GregMitch34 is offline
Greg Mitchell
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New York City area
Posts: 2,437
Default

I'm the one who did, and updated, the recent "combined pop report," which only focuses on the numbers, but I have to say--how much difference is there between a card with 19 pop and, say, 27? Especially since you could have more listed but more of other never graded; or even if graded not likely to be circulated any time soon; or in a Titus-itis move, someone is collecting and keeping a large number of one player. I wonder if going by how many have been put for sale in past decade is better gauge...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2014, 08:20 AM
btkpath's Avatar
btkpath btkpath is offline
Barry
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregMitch34 View Post
I wonder if going by how many have been put for sale in past decade is better gauge...
Valid point…..

Cady sales recorded on VCP 3
Shotten sales reported on VCP 7
Pratt sales reported on VCP 9

Obviously does not include private sales or raw card sales, but, as Greg mentions, might be another gauge to use to assess rarity.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2014, 08:28 AM
GregMitch34's Avatar
GregMitch34 GregMitch34 is offline
Greg Mitchell
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New York City area
Posts: 2,437
Default

Also, in my combined pop report, I added listings for graded cards greater than '3" and greater than '4" and there are some stark differences. However, I mainly did the HOFers and a few others before running out of gas so did not do for the really scarce cards...so, again, if you're looking for, say, a "5" for someone that card could be virtually the highest graded where a less common card could have several 5s or better...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2014, 08:33 AM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,521
Default

Lou Lowdermilk called. He says you should stop prying into things you weren't meant to know.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2014, 09:38 AM
bn2cardz's Avatar
bn2cardz bn2cardz is offline
₳₦ĐɎ ₦ɆɄ฿ɆⱤ₮
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregMitch34 View Post
... I wonder if going by how many have been put for sale in past decade is better gauge...
I have been saying this for a while now. With cardtarget and vcp it makes sense to look at past sales along with pop reports. Pop reports can be wrong due to cards being submitted multiple times and some cards never getting slabbed. Yet when you use that info along with the sales reports you can get a better picture of what you may see in the future. Neither method alone can give you a full picture. Because past sales don't show cards sold in lots or just because you see 3 sales lately doesn't mean they are 3 different cards it could just be two buyers that tried to flip the same card until it ended up in a collection.

There is so much more info now that can be used to come up with a full picture.

As far as the pratt I fully believe the value is higher because of the particular image is rarer due to only being in the '14 set. There are many collectors that don't give priority to the back that just want one of each image. So the images that are only found in either set go for higher prices, then you add on top of that the limited sales of the '14 Pratt it will lead to higher prices.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-27-2014, 11:41 AM
sniffy5 sniffy5 is offline
Tom Prince
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 200
Default

I heard that the Rueckheim Bros. and Eckstein were so overloaded with unpurchased Cracker Jack boxes containing 2nd series cards that in the Fall of 1914 that they rented a barge and dumped 14,999,900 boxes into New York harbor.

I think anyone who wants to collect this set needs to have his head examined. Everyone please report to Barry, stat!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-27-2014, 11:50 AM
Jacker_ Cracks's Avatar
Jacker_ Cracks Jacker_ Cracks is offline
James R. Hill
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniffy5 View Post
I heard that the Rueckheim Bros. and Eckstein were so overloaded with unpurchased Cracker Jack boxes containing 2nd series cards that in the Fall of 1914 that they rented a barge and dumped 14,999,900 boxes into New York harbor.

I think anyone who wants to collect this set needs to have his head examined. Everyone please report to Barry, stat!
Funny chit Tom!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-28-2014, 05:20 PM
Theo_450's Avatar
Theo_450 Theo_450 is offline
Ted
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Dirty South
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bn2cardz View Post
As far as the pratt I fully believe the value is higher because of the particular image is rarer due to only being in the '14 set. There are many collectors that don't give priority to the back that just want one of each image. So the images that are only found in either set go for higher prices, then you add on top of that the limited sales of the '14 Pratt it will lead to higher prices.
A reasonable theory, but it does not explain the 1914 Zeider throwing pose. There was also a portrait pose of Zeider in the 1914 set. The throwing pose was dropped in 1915, and by your theory should command a higher price than it actually does.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-28-2014, 07:11 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,528
Default

Good point....I think Pratt is one of those hobby hypes that is a self fulfilling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Theo_450 View Post
A reasonable theory, but it does not explain the 1914 Zeider throwing pose. There was also a portrait pose of Zeider in the 1914 set. The throwing pose was dropped in 1915, and by your theory should command a higher price than it actually does.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB/T for 1914 CJ's:I have Honus/rare cards sniffy5 Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 0 12-22-2013 03:50 PM
1914 Rare Cracker Jack Cards for Sale Guttapercha Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 10 07-13-2013 09:54 AM
RARE 1914 Buck Weaver Postcard Shoeless Moe Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 4 09-14-2011 06:17 PM
Which is the most rare 1914 Cracker Jack? Bigb13 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 12 07-11-2011 07:09 PM
1914 Boston Braves Evers Pin (Extremely Rare) canjond Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 1 05-02-2010 09:21 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM.


ebay GSB