 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-02-2014, 08:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Just strange that the defects in the 2.5 card are all hard to see in the scans, in the shadows, or only visible in person, while the dog ears on the corners of the 4 are clearly visible from any and all photos/scans/artist's renderings, etc.
I guess I need to get better educated with the grading rules. Last edited by Bigdaddy; 09-02-2014 at 08:27 PM. 
|
|
#2
09-03-2014, 12:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
They are both also scanned using completely different settings. Look how much brighter and washed out the 2.5 looks. Surface image has been descreened and flattened. Personally I'd rather have the dog ears, then surface wrinkles on a card, but I may be in the minority.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I Will Never Understand This. | t206hof | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 10-21-2010 05:40 PM |
| I just don't understand | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-22-2003 10:47 AM |
| Okay, help me understand this | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 08-02-2002 10:22 PM |
| help me understand... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-12-2002 04:43 PM |
| PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND PSA! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-24-2002 02:53 AM |
Hybrid Mode
