OT: Did Adam Dunn ruin his Hall chances

Tabe · #1 09-22-2014, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sago

Hernandez is GOAT fielding first baseman. His range made the entire infield better. Overall better than Olerud.

If Hernandez is the best-fielding 1B of all-time, Olerud is only a hair behind.

Offensively, Olerud hit 93 more homers in 146 more games. They had essentially the same batting average (.296 vs .295) with Olerud having a higher slugging percentage (.465 vs .436) and essentially the same OPS+ (129 vs 128). Hernandez won a (shared) MVP but never had a season that approached Olerud's 1993 - .363 average, .473 OBP, .599 slug, OPS+ of 186.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pbspelly

According to one sabermetric stat (Total Zone Runs), Hernandez's defense saved 117 runs in his career, the most ever for a first baseman. Olerud comes in fourth at 97, still excellent, but nearly 20% behind.

So, defensively, the difference between them was 20 runs over the course of 2100 games (or so). A run every 105 games. I believe that difference would qualify as "statistically insignificant".

And, in the end, we're talking about what is, by FAR, the least-important (other than pitcher) and easiest position defensively. But among the guys who played that position, we're talking about Hernandez and Olerud - the elite of the elite defensively. They are really, really close defensively and really, really close offensively. If anything, Olerud was the best offensive player. And yet there are folks who advocate for Hernandez to be in the HOF but dismiss Olerud out-of-hand. That doesn't compute.

sago · #2 09-22-2014, 06:17 PM

Hernandez had a shorter career than Olerud, but still finished with higher career totals for putouts and assists. And while Hernandez did not ever hit .363 (.344 in his MVP year is pretty good), outside of a .350 plus year, neither did Olerud.

And pretty sure left field is less important and easier than first base.

Tabe · #3 09-22-2014, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sago

Hernandez had a shorter career than Olerud, but still finished with higher career totals for putouts and assists. And while Hernandez did not ever hit .363 (.344 in his MVP year is pretty good), outside of a .350 plus year, neither did Olerud.

Yes, Hernandez had more putouts and assists. A lot more. You think playing in the era of astro turf might have something to do with the putouts? Perhaps. Regardless, I've never made the argument that they were equal defensively. Hernandez is universally regarded as the GOAT at first. No problem with that. But Olerud was really, really close (see the above "runs saved" stat).

As for their offense...I don't quite follow. You're saying, "Sure, Hernandez hit that well but neither did Olerud...except that other time that he did." So Hernandez had his 1979 but Olerud had 1993 and 1998 that were both better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sago

And pretty sure left field is less important and easier than first base.

How do I know first base is easier and less important than LF? Cuz Mo Vaughn, David Ortiz, and Miguel Cabrera all play(ed) 1B and would have no prayer of ever being able to play LF.

sago · #4 09-22-2014, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabe

Yes, Hernandez had more putouts and assists. A lot more. You think playing in the era of astro turf might have something to do with the putouts? Perhaps. Regardless, I've never made the argument that they were equal defensively. Hernandez is universally regarded as the GOAT at first. No problem with that. But Olerud was really, really close (see the above "runs saved" stat).

As for their offense...I don't quite follow. You're saying, "Sure, Hernandez hit that well but neither did Olerud...except that other time that he did." So Hernandez had his 1979 but Olerud had 1993 and 1998 that were both better.

How do I know first base is easier and less important than LF? Cuz Mo Vaughn, David Ortiz, and Miguel Cabrera all play(ed) 1B and would have no prayer of ever being able to play LF.

Normalize for American League being easier to hit in if you want to argue about Astroturf. Putting a bunch of slow guys in left field is silly. What is also silly is comparing fielding bunts, sharper reaction times, and a host of other pitch by pitch skills versus, essentially, catching fly balls and making the shortest relay and throws to home of any outfield position.

Anyway, agree to disagree.

ejharrington · #5 09-22-2014, 07:14 PM

If you look at the JAWS system (http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/jaws_1B.shtml) a statistical case can be made that Hernandez is more than a borderline HOFer. There are 11 HOF 1B ranked ahead of him (Gehrig, Foxx, Anson, Connor, Brouthers, Mize, F. Thomas (DH), McCovey, Murray, Greenberg, and Sisler). There are 7 HOF 1B ranked lower than him (Terry, Beckley, Perez, Cepeda, Chance, Bottomley, Kelly). So statistically and quantitatively, he is right in the mix. More subjectively, other than the fact that I watched him play for five years and considered him the best player on the Mets, the fact that he won an MVP, was a key member of two different World Champions, was the greatest fielder of all-time at 1B, and IS ALREADY famous, he is more than worthy of being in the Hall of Fame.

Peter_Spaeth · #6 09-22-2014, 08:47 PM

OLERUD.

Black Ink Batting - 7 (326), Average HOFer ≈ 27

Gray Ink Batting - 51 (504), Average HOFer ≈ 144

Hall of Fame Monitor Batting - 68 (292), Likely HOFer ≈ 100

Hall of Fame Standards Batting - 39 (180), Average HOFer ≈ 50

JAWS First Base (20th), 58.0 career WAR/38.9 7yr-peak WAR/48.5 JAWS
Average HOF 1B (out of 19) = 65.9 career WAR/42.4 7yr-peak WAR/54.2 JAWS

HERNANDEZ

Black Ink Batting - 14 (170), Average HOFer ≈ 27

Gray Ink Batting - 118 (173), Average HOFer ≈ 144

Hall of Fame Monitor Batting - 86 (215), Likely HOFer ≈ 100

Hall of Fame Standards Batting - 32 (266), Average HOFer ≈ 50

JAWS First Base (18th), 60.0 career WAR/41.0 7yr-peak WAR/50.5 JAWS
Average HOF 1B (out of 19) = 65.9 career WAR/42.4 7yr-peak WAR/54.2 JAWS

Let's just say NO to both and move on.

ejharrington · #7 09-22-2014, 09:25 PM

I guess Ozzie Smith shouldn't be in the HOF either, huh?

Black Ink Batting - 2 (617), Average HOFer ≈ 27

Gray Ink Batting - 51 (504), Average HOFer ≈ 144

Hall of Fame Monitor Batting - 142 (95), Likely HOFer ≈ 100

Hall of Fame Standards Batting - 35 (219), Average HOFer ≈ 50

Peter_Spaeth · #8 09-22-2014, 10:18 PM

Ozzie qualifies in one category, unlike the other two. And you expect much better batting stats from your first baseman than your shortstop. So when the shortstop is the greatest ever, you can forgive him a 2500 hit career with 600 steals.

Tabe · #9 09-23-2014, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Let's just say NO to both and move on.

That's exactly the point I'm making.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What Are the Chances?	barrysloate	Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk	12	09-23-2012 08:43 AM
Joe Dunn in a Jack Dunn Slab	bjcunningham	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	5	09-12-2011 11:34 PM
What are the chances?	tlwise12	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	2	03-09-2011 01:23 AM
What can ruin a card's grade? Show them here!	SethY	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	26	01-23-2010 07:25 PM
Chances	Archive	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	1	12-13-2008 07:30 PM