who is more inept?

[sbfinley]

They got his career HR total right up to that point...

[Brian Van Horn]

People can say what they want about Mendoza at the plate. Despite the moniker given him by fellow players and later Chris Berman, he had a good glove. As for Topps and their card on him.....Error.

[Jeffrompa]

Maybe they were concentrating on the Wacky Packages Re-Issue .

[Brian Van Horn]

Just on a whim, I looked up his stats. He actually batted .245 for Seattle in 1980.

[Wite3]

Mickey Hatcher once said that he would be proud to be the worst player in major league baseball rather than the best player that never played major league baseball...good for Mario, bad for Topps is my vote.

Joshua

[clydepepper]

It must be my 'Mendoza-line' eyes, but I'm not seeing the error. Could someone please point out what is so obvious to others?

Thanks, Mr. MaGoo

[itjclarke]

Originally Posted by clydepepper

It must be my 'Mendoza-line' eyes, but I'm not seeing the error. Could someone please point out what is so obvious to others?

Thanks, Mr. MaGoo

The lifetime batting average isn't calculated correctly (far above the Mondoza line).

Makes we wonder how many other random numerical errors may be out there... And how many stat lines I may have memorized incorrectly as a kid

[frankbmd]

Originally Posted by clydepepper

It must be my 'Mendoza-line' eyes, but I'm not seeing the error. Could someone please point out what is so obvious to others?

Thanks, Mr. MaGoo

I thought that he was putting a large condom on his bat to prevent "hits".

[Exhibitman]

Originally Posted by clydepepper

It must be my 'Mendoza-line' eyes, but I'm not seeing the error. Could someone please point out what is so obvious to others?

Thanks, Mr. MaGoo

The card is badly o/c

[steve B]

Originally Posted by Wite3

Mickey Hatcher once said that he would be proud to be the worst player in major league baseball rather than the best player that never played major league baseball...good for Mario, bad for Topps is my vote.

Joshua

That's so true. Anyone hitting even 200 in the majors is a very good hitter.

And anyone with doubts should take a few turns in a batting cage that's set for 90+. I've done it with predictable results. I was very happy with my one bit of audible contact out of 40-60 pitches. And that's with a machine that's somewhat predictable and not actively trying to make you miss. Totally changed my outlook on hitters while I was watching a game from the couch.

Not the same for the folks at Topps. Although I have to admit I've owned lots of those card and never noticed the mistake.

Steve B

[itjclarke]

Originally Posted by steve B

That's so true. Anyone hitting even 200 in the majors is a very good hitter.

And anyone with doubts should take a few turns in a batting cage that's set for 90+. I've done it with predictable results. I was very happy with my one bit of audible contact out of 40-60 pitches. And that's with a machine that's somewhat predictable and not actively trying to make you miss. Totally changed my outlook on hitters while I was watching a game from the couch.

Not the same for the folks at Topps. Although I have to admit I've owned lots of those card and never noticed the mistake.

Steve B

Totally agree with this and with Hatcher quote, though do feel most people who've played some and still have a pretty good swing can eventually make decent, regular contact at high speeds in a cage. On the field it's totally different though. Different arm angles, different speeds, and location make the cage seem like child's play. Tip of the cap to Mr Mario Mendoza and all the other "commons" who top off the rosters in our great game.

Topps whiffed on this one for sure... Of course in their defense, I presume this is before any sort of spreadsheet that would do the math for you... So with that said, tip of the cap to all those guys who crunched numbers with a calculator, and before that did so manually.