Its as Plain as the Nose on your Face-the Ear Thing isn't Gospel

[Econteachert205]

Here is I believe the original thread

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=163481


I wasn't a member then. I looked over the thread and tried to be as objective as one might be. Whatever you may believe about the photo, I do not think there is enough evidence to present the image as comiskey. To me after looking at several similar discussions, the burden has to lie on proving it is someone, not proving it is not. This is especially true where value is involved.

[Directly]

One saying one ear compared to another 150 year photo found to satisfy them and hopefully others to me isn't proof either?

So now what?

[thecatspajamas]

Please tell me there is more to your jaw-dropping expose than "I stand by my insight without any reservation."

[Lordstan]

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

Please tell me there is more to your jaw-dropping expose than "I stand by my insight without any reservation."

Lance,
Please don't feed the troll.
No amount of evidence will convince him. There is no point responding.

[Directly]

Did you know Comiskey was once shown a photograph:

Quote: Comiskey was once shown a photograph which he didn't even own a copy. He pointed out Reis and Alveretta, the acrobat. Adding This was a good team.

My revelation--

Which photo was Comiskey describing mine or the composite? I really do believe he was referring to my Dubuque baseball team photograph? Hence my corrections

I have shared my photo with the Comiskey family and she was happy and thrilled to see my photo, and that's really all that matters to me--

I appreciate this forum letting me post my work! Its a great site! I really do enjoy reading the threads and I don't by any means wish to cause any bad feeling-just facts! thanks again, Tom