|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Hi Adam, Here is your card, with the image rotated. I'm still pondering whether or not it has been trimmed...the top left corner looks a bit too "square" at first glance. Best regards, Eric | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			tough one...diamond cut looks even...top left corner def a little sharp...bottom rt edge looks wavy but I presume thats because it's a poor photo. a scan would help. | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Thanks.  I'll try to scan it tomorrow and see if that helps.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Peter, I agree, on both points. The diamond cut is "equal and opposite," as it should be. Overall, though, it seems a bit short, from top to bottom...ever so slightly. Perhaps it was trimmed along two sides? And yes, a scan would be quite helpful. Best regards, Eric | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I think the right edge is wavy.  Could just be the photo.  When something looks wavy, I just put another card on the table and use the black border line as a guide and see if the card in question has a completely straight edge.
		 
				__________________ ThatT206Life.com | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			To me it looks like both sides are slightly trimmed and not a true diamond cut. I don't think any TPG would give it a numerical grade as a result. Just my opinion of course.
		 
				__________________ T206 518/518 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Yes 
			
			I have no comment on the card in question.  But to the first question of cards being returned E of T and subsequently getting a number grade, I have had both SGC and PSA return cards as E of T and subsequently assign a number grade on a resubmission.  I have also cracked out cards from both graders that were definately trimmed that subsequently would not cross or would not regrade. The graders are not perfect. Last edited by BleedinBlue; 10-22-2014 at 12:19 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I can't recall seeing a diamond cut that occurred on the left/right sides; only top/bottom.  I'd say trimmed as well.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Trimmed in my opinion but you should have a much clearer view.  Don't let your hopes cloud your view.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			+1  ...and my opinion as well.
		 
				__________________ Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| 1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM | 
| Legendary Lot 72: 1909-1920s "E"-Caramel Cards and "W"-Strip Cards "Grab-Bag" | x2drich2000 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 09-02-2013 10:07 AM | 
| Searching for a "Pirate" Cobb....show us these extremely rare "T215" cards ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 12-02-2012 08:52 PM | 
| Large amount of "e", "w", and "t" cards (and more) for sale/trade!! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2010 11:31 AM | 
| "All cards listed are not trimmed and measure out according to specs" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-20-2002 07:38 PM |