|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just on the talk about the possible trimming....Whenever I buy an expensive card now I find myself hand-wringing and half convinced I have been ripped off if something seems a little amiss...is there any sort of standard tolerance PSA uses for mimimum size? I just got a PSA 8 65 Morgan that is nicely centered and otherwise sharp, but by my measurement about 1/64th of an inch shy of 2.5" top to bottom...then I notice the little imperfections in the slab...am I just being paranoid over this fractional length? Were vintage cards typically varying in size by these slight degrees?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I work for a label company and we abide by an industry standard of +/- 1/64" for size variation, and we supply nation brands with this tolerance. Some apply labels at 1000+ containers per minute so sizing is critical.
I'm sure we cut labels in the same manner as 50 years ago with a guillotine process. We even have programable machines. The +/- tolerance is needed for process variation. You should be good. Quote:
__________________
Regards, Lu.i$ G@.rz@ |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
One of my favorites by PSA:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
It took me a second to notice that edge, then my jaw hit the floor.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yowzers! About as obvious as it gets. I will lay money that this is one card that will never be cracked and resubmitted.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
...
Last edited by Rollingstone206; 02-09-2015 at 08:48 AM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lol.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Paid for by ............ ????????
__________________
Transaction thanks to: Andretti83, Beatles Guy, Bocabirdman, Brailey, Bryon Long, buckyball1, cincyredlegs, cparker94, dealme, deltufjp2, detroitbaseball, dougscats, drmondobueno, Edwolf1963, esiason14, familytoad, freakhappy, GehrigFan, grainsley, hangman62, JasonL, jschris, kamikidEFFL, KC Doughboy, LukeLyon, marslife, rainier2004, swohscs, tedzan, tinkertoeverstochance, vcuono, and more... |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
deleted
Last edited by vthobby; 12-05-2014 at 12:32 AM. Reason: deleted |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is it possible that the 1941 Playball is a "paper" card and that's just the way the edge was cut?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reagarding the Spahn Bowman cards.... wow - that is absolutely ridiculous... my only guess is that the submitter must have been a "Preferred PSA" submitter/customer....
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks, Peter!
|
![]() |
|
|