Why the seeming lack of interest in 1964 Topps Giants, 1971 Topps Super?

[Zach Wheat]

I collect the 1971 Topps Supers. I think the set is kind of neat, even if it is an oddball set.

The fact the card edges "chip" and dent have always kept me from seriously collecting them Given their oddball size...makes it really hard to keep in a Mn condition. I have yet to find a good holder for them as well.

Nice set though with a good selection of super stars. And what about the 1980 Topps Superstars? You forgot to mention that oversize "set".....and its only 60 cards.


Z Wheat

[toppcat]

I think the Giants suffer from being overproduced in '64. You could buy them in bricks of 1000 for a song back in the 70's as one dealer bought almost all of the returns. They are a great set though. The '70 and '71 Supers are also nice, especially the ones with the Yankee Stadium backdrops but I think they are just too thick and finding ones that are centered is a bear.

[Exhibitman]

I think most collectors have issues with the size and thickness...sounds like my wife.

Thanks, you've been a great crowd. Enjoy Slade.

[cprice72]

Don't know the production numbers but here is an article that explains why the '64 giants are reasonably priced even 50 years later.

http://www.sportscollectorsdaily.com...ant-stars-set/

[ALR-bishop]

I have both sets . They both have great photos. They are only disappointing if you collect them to make money

[bobc88]

I love the Topps oversized sets!

[glynparson]

1964 topps giants actually sell rather quickly in my experience. They just do not sell for a ton of money. A couple bring decent bucks in higher grades.

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by Exhibitman

I think most collectors have issues with the size and thickness...sounds like my wife.

Thanks, you've been a great crowd. Enjoy Slade.

WOW, a Slade reference.

Gudbuy T'Jane!