|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
To me, the Mantle looks like a vintage example and I think it is okay, lots of speed. I think the Foxx is okay as well.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Both are authentic
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
download.jpgJoe, I would really like to have you show me a mantle cut where the second m is much higher than the first.I gave my reason why I felt know please who me why you say yes. I said I could be wrong so proof it.
![]() I looked at a hundred just like this one That is what through me off.I usually am able to say yes in a second not this one. Look at the two Ms and I think you and everyone else can see what I mean. download.jpg Last edited by shelly; 12-16-2014 at 12:07 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
What year do you think this mantle was done.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it's similar to the era of this example, even though this is a stacked one. Hopefully I can get this to post correctly from my iPad.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please look at picture from Scott. This is a club house signature. I was trying to show that a vintage signature of Mantle is not from the Seventies. From around 68 on was the signature we see the most.
In regards to the cut that started this all my opinion stands. ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by shelly; 12-16-2014 at 07:14 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
FWIW, I think its good. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Which autograph do you think is good. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The one in the OP.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry posted wrong ball it is a clubhouse.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's one that I think would be from the same era as the OP one style wise, probably a little more current.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
The last one Shelly posted was an error - here is a vintage example Shelly asked me to post for him - a true vintage Mantle. 1970's was not vintage.
And Jeff - Shelly says: "Good eyes, Jeff - very well-done".
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 09-10-2018 at 03:39 PM. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When I originally used the term vintage, I should have been more specific, I meant 1970's all along. To me that is somewhat vintage :-) The examples I have had on balls from the early to about 1956 are drastically different. In my opinion, there are a ton of differences between his 1970 signature and the ones your see from the late 1980's and early 1990's too, like all the UDA ones. Mostly in the "K" but also other places. We may just have to agree to disagree on this one, just from what I can see in the scan I would probably be comfortable buying it. Last edited by ATP; 12-16-2014 at 07:11 PM. Reason: typo |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opinions on a Jimmie Foxx autograph | Sportsnutcards | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 05-28-2014 07:47 PM |
| Jimmie Foxx Baseball Opinions | Real or fake? | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 12-07-2013 07:59 PM |
| Mantle Opinions | Wymers Auction | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 11-09-2013 12:52 PM |
| 1950's Ball W/ Foxx, Mantle, Stengel, Williams...all ID'd now. Thx! | ATP | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 06-09-2013 11:25 PM |
| 1966 topps double punchout mickey mantle jim ray hart | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 11-17-2011 06:00 PM |