|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Thanks Joe.  I have an email in to Brandon - if I don't hear back from him, I'll post in the forum you suggested. I recently purchased a 1925 OAL Reach baseball that I feel certain is legit (in January pick-ups thread), but I'm thinking that since I might be acquiring more signed vintage balls, this is an area I should grow some skills in. 
				__________________ $co++ Forre$+ | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			You may find this thread on determining fake balls helpful.... http://forum.bigleaguebaseballs.com/...lit=Fake#p2774 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			sorry scott, I  couldnt resist being a smart ass!  I do it all day long at work so why not share the love with you guys!
		 Last edited by w7imel; 01-08-2015 at 05:37 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 The thread you linked to implies that forgeries of old balls are generally easy to spot because the forgers generally use balls with protruded laces and/or they use laser-printing instead of real stamps. I was under the impression that there were some pretty good forgeries of Ruth-era baseballs, and the balls themselves often proved that the autograph had to be bad, since the balls were forgeries. Now I'm wondering if I misread something during those discussions. It seems to me that it would make much more sense for a forger to use a supply of well-made forged balls than to pay $500 or so for real ones and risk screwing up while signing. But I guess you could screw up quite a few single-signed Ruth balls and still make money, and besides - a lot of money has been spent for fairly bad Ruth forgeries, so the demand for them is there. 
				__________________ $co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 01-08-2015 at 06:30 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Thanks for everyone's help.  I felt as good about a Babe Ruth autographed ball as one can feel, but this was my first 'big' signed vintage ball purchase and I have a feeling I will be picking up more of them.  That being the case, I need to get edumacated.  Brandon said the ball is good.  I'll be buying his set of two books to learn more: http://www.historyofthebaseball.com
		 
				__________________ $co++ Forre$+ | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			They are great books. Have found them to be valuable resources.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Brandon is a valuable resource as well, and I've found him to be very friendly and helpful when I have ball-related questions. Definitely an asset to the hobby, and I appreciate his willingness to share his knowledge. 
				__________________ Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Forged Mantles and Ruths | NateMack | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 04-09-2014 03:56 PM | 
| 50 Most Forged Sports Autographs book | djson1 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 01-03-2014 01:17 PM | 
| Most forged of 2013 (submitted to PSA) | Deertick | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 12-27-2013 06:42 PM | 
| Just saw this Forged Mickey Mantle Ball on TV | drc | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 05-25-2012 07:29 AM | 
| Most common forged Mantle on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-04-2005 09:13 AM |