|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Brian,
My evolving preference for SGC has to do with two basic factors: 1. Aesthetics. The cards just look best, in my opinion, in these holders. The PSA holders by comparison look cheap to my eye and simply do not frame the cards in as majestic a manner. Anecdotally, I recently visited my cousin during the holiday, who has always collected and is now getting into graded cards for the protection of the card, as opposed to all his old screw downs, LOL. His mind was utterly impartial when he looked at my cards, and said, "Why do you have some in these cheap looking clear plastic ones and others in these awesome black ones?" That pure knee-jerk assessment pretty much sums it up. I collect more Post War cards, but also a healthy amount of Pre War favorites. As to the tangential issue of potential resale and value, which inevitably arises in a discussion of preferred holder, I am a believer in the primacy of the card— and thus have faith that a great card like your Jackie Robinson will get its price no matter what the holder, provided enough collectors get eyeballs on it over time. Also, if a collector is intending to hold a card for ten years, twenty years, and way beyond, it is impossible to predict what company's holder will be the most trusted in that timeframe. So I say go with what pleases you in terms of enjoying and displaying your collection, and address factors of bumps, numerical grade, and resale when that time comes. 2. I believe that SGC grades consistently, and lets the card get its deserving grade, without considering how much money it is worth to the collector, what it will do for their brand in terms of diluting pop reports, and whether or not assigning a stingy grade will incite a card's owner to engage in repeated reviews or submissions, paying a new fee each time in hopes that the subjective number put on the sticker will finally reflect the truth of the card. Anyways, hope sharing that take on the subject is beneficial. Best, Matt Last edited by MattyC; 01-09-2015 at 01:54 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I will say again though that for this card you are 100% correct in saying it looks beautiful in this holder. Unfortunately I am one for consistency so I want it to be like its friends in PSA cases. Are all those cards in your sig link yours? If so, care to part with a '51 Mantle? ![]() Thanks again. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, yep that is my collection in the sig. I'm actually seeking more 51B Micks but they are hard to find with even decent centering and no vertical print lines.
I totally agree the perforated label and print quality of the label is the Achilles of the SGC holder. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ah, just sold mine a couple months ago to help land a new card. Was a dead centered example with focus. I miss it but am far more of a Mantle guy.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brian: Beautiful card by the way. I have my Jackie in the same grade.
MattyC; no way your getting my 51 Mick out of my bare hands. LOL! We all know Matty has beautiful cards and taste. Brian: i am also on the Rookie card quest, and have many cards your either active or looking for, hope our sides dont meet up as i been busy placing bids, sure dont wanna raise the roof.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads collection Headed to LoTG auctions this November fall auction |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for the kind words on the card. I am pleased. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Leaf Jackie Robinson BVG-3 | itjclarke | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 01-25-2015 11:42 PM |
| FS Jackie Robinson Rookie Leaf | Nappy1525 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-13-2014 04:17 PM |
| WTB-Leaf Jackie Robinson | itjclarke | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2013 02:45 PM |
| WTB 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson | poorlydrawncat | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-08-2013 11:35 PM |
| FS: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson RC | matty6 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-03-2012 10:08 AM |