|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I saw these the other day in the HA auction. Just doesn't add up for me. Interested in hearing the experts chime in on these.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
did Joe all of a sudden learn how to write that day
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
A very large and reasonably neat signature AND INSCRIPTION,,,in my opinion very typical of Joe Jackson. NOT !!
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Sign up & receive my autograph price list. E mail me,richsprt@aol.com, with your e mail. Sports,entertainment,history. - Here is a link to my online store. Many items for sale. 10% disc. for 54 members. E mail me first. www.bonanza.com/booths/richsports -- "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."- Clarence Darrow Last edited by RichardSimon; 02-09-2015 at 12:04 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The inscriptions on the photos is noted as being in the hand of the photographer, for what it's worth.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The autograph from the photographer is worth the same as the Joe Jackson signature
.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In comparing this signature to my Joe Jackson auto ( I own his signed 1945 South Carolina driver's license ) and checking those on the PSA autograph facts site I have no confidence in this piece. IMO it is just too neat and too perfect for something signed by Joe, especially signed in 1911 when his career was just beginning to take off and getting the recognition that comes with that. His handwriting at that time would, in my opinion , be as "rough " and unformed as ever since he was young and not accustomed to signing anything he would not have to. A young illiterate man I can't fathom signing that neatly, when his other signatures from the rest of his career/life are not that smooth looking.
I would not bid on it ...I maybe wrong , but I would not let the lure of this photo suck me in. Last edited by Klrdds; 02-13-2015 at 10:58 PM. Reason: Corrected a date error: entered 1948 instead of 1945 |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The article makes it sound like PSA assessed the prints themselves as from the same period as the autographs (1911). PSA is pretty good about getting print age correct.
Heritage uses the term "ironclad provenance" to describe the Mathewson signature. Since they came from the same scrapbook, the Jackson must have the same ironclad provenance: "Bowen's husband, Bill, first saw the scrapbook about 10 years ago. It was stored in a barn near Cleveland and belonged to a couple whose family was friends with Frank W. Smith, a photographer with the Plain Dealer newspaper." I think it's really neat how this stuff gets found in barns.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
That "Jackson" is just as good as the rest of the signatures in the grouping. Did you see the "Mathewson"?
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: SUPER RARE Lou Jackson Autograph w/COA SOLD | quinnsryche | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 4 | 02-01-2015 09:21 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson autograph request letter | GrayGhost | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 07-21-2014 07:45 AM |
| 1915 White Sox Photograph Including Shoeless Joe Jackson?? Rare? Info? | blackmamba | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-30-2011 10:14 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson E90-1 on E Bay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-28-2007 10:09 AM |
| Shoeless Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 68 | 03-31-2007 07:00 PM |