|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Another tell tale sign of artificial aging... notice how the card is all creased up and ripped, but the corners are overall fairly sharp. The wear is inconsistent. The biggest flag, though, is in the image. The color and print are all wrong, as other have noticed and pointed out. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
, but that seems like a lot...I would guess around 1-1.5k, but I'm not an expert on '52 Mantle's. That being said, the most important parts of the card are still intact, so maybe it would be closer to your guesstimate.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 Last edited by freakhappy; 02-12-2015 at 11:17 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
HAha... I'm no beast, Mike, but I appreciate the compliment. ![]() I think you are right and I was off on the first estimate -- $2K tops with that much missing, and your 1.5K looks good. The damage on the fake Mantle posted in the OP is so over the top. We see a lot of beaters in the hobby, many cards that are "well loved", but it seems rare to find a card ripped up like that (usually at that point the card would be tossed out, not worth saving). |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mantle owned SGC 80 1952 Topps Mantle card | Doug | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 01-06-2012 01:29 PM |
| 1952 KSA 5 Mantle | JeremyW | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 09-05-2011 12:16 PM |
| Better than a 1952 Mantle! | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 01-14-2009 06:58 AM |
| WTB 1952 Mantle #311 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-01-2008 10:04 AM |
| 1952 Mantle PSA 3 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-27-2006 12:12 AM |