|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm a little confused on the M101-4/5 Ruth. That is his rookie card or are you considering the Baltimore News minor league card, which is really a pre-rookie card, by definition.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
1915 Red Sox team postcard?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just my opinion, but there is nothing anyone could ever say to convince me that a team card is anyone's RC. Four on a card is my maximum or I guess, if you have to take out a magnifying glass to find the player, it doesn't count as a RC.
__________________
Dan |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why 4? Seems like an arbitrary number. Why not 2? Or 5? Or just one?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can't be one. Too many 60s and on HOFers are featured on cards with two, three, or four players. The whole "Rookie Stars" era of Topps.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I guess its more that I can't imagine anyone getting a Boston Red Sox team card in a 1975 topps pack and telling someone they have Jim Rice and Fred Lynn's RC. It sounds ridiculous to me.
__________________
Dan |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Over the years, Topps went with a max of 4 on their rookie star cards, that's the primary reason. Would anyone consider 1964 Pete Rose's RC because he appeared with 3 others on the 1963 card? I think not......Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think Topps ever pictured 5 or more players on one of their rookie star cards.
Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 03-16-2015 at 04:09 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I could be mistaken but wasn't there a league leader card that pictured someone before they had an actual "card"?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
). I assume this is the highest price paid for any postcard or any team card.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
WOW, Gary, you think someone overpaid for that one? I don't think any previous examples sold for over $30K.........
You're right about the '62's, Todd. I would consider those to be rookie cards as well since Topps' intention was quite obvious there, just added one additional player as compared to later years. This scenario is far different than a 1915 Red Sox team photo or 1906 Detroit team composite issued on postcards with the entire team present. These can still be earliest major league baseball appearances on cards for Ruth and Cobb, just not rookie cards. Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 03-16-2015 at 06:33 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yea, I agree that price seems very high. Will just have to see if future sales for this issue will all rise like this or if this is just a one-off outlier.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Questionable autograph | etsmith | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 09-05-2014 12:10 PM |
| Another questionable Mantle | Nappy1525 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 07-25-2014 01:30 PM |
| Another Questionable Auction... | Wanzies1278 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-12-2009 03:56 PM |
| N4: QUESTIONABLE AUTHENTICITY | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-04-2008 07:30 PM |
| questionable purchase much? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-22-2005 07:31 PM |