|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Undergraded
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Honest corner wear.
Better than the technical grade.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Corners so sharp you could do a vasectomy on a mosquito." I can live without that one, even if true.
Also, "Best eva? Hellz yeah!" Runners up are "gnarly" and "bitchin'" Bootylicious is okay depending on the context including pop report. And anything that insults my intelligence. Which is everything. Though I did get a good chuckle out of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Oh, and any auction descriptions spoken in a fake cockney accent. Oh, and "the." Tired of that word. Oh, I'm sure it's a great language an all and they're fine upstanding people, but I don't speak Mandarin. Last time, I thought I bid on a 1956 Topps partial set and ended up getting a plate of butter. And what's with the background Muzak on the auction sites these days? When I'm trying to bid, I really can live without the symphonic version of U Can't Touch This. Oh yeah, and actually put the item in a box or envelope. Don't just place a stamp and write the mailing address on the cabinet card. Or at the very least do it on the back. Twice that's happened this year. Last edited by drcy; 03-19-2015 at 12:16 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Blazer"
__________________
My website with current cards http://syckscards.weebly.com Always looking for 1938 Goudey's |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
R u making a mockery of this thread???? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Or descriptions you may never see
"overgraded piece of cardboard that makes you want to upchuck at a price that only a loving mother would consider paying....."
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
"The scary thing about David is, when you get to know him, you realize he isn't trying to be funny."
Last edited by drcy; 03-19-2015 at 12:27 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"…if he is laughing, it is too late."
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 03-19-2015 at 12:54 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
One major auction house "creatively" used "Hand Cut" instead of "Trimmed" for some Rice-Stix cards.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
As someone who wrote auction lots for years, I will tell you it is not the easiest thing to get exactly right. If your description is too long, you bore the bidder and he is likely to glaze over it. If it's too short, you may not be creating the kind of excitement you might want. If you use too many superlatives and call every lot spectacular, you strain the credibility of your audience. But if you lowkey it too much, you kind of piss off the consignor, especially if the lot doesn't do as well as you hoped.
So it's really an art, and it takes practice to get it right. I think the number one thing every bidder wants to know is the specifics of condition. Most of the stuff around that description is fluff...but a little fluff is probably okay. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Words are in place
To help us all see What our eyes don't tell us We may read and believe Made up words Too good to be true Help to inform Me and you That the card that we see Is the card we must have And to win the auction Would make us most glad.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
See...I don't think (undergraded) that is a bad term. If you have a 1.5 that looks like a 3, then pray tell, what do you call it?!?!?!?!?!
Last edited by bobbyw8469; 03-23-2015 at 05:22 PM. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Most of my favorites have already been covered but there are two that just annoy the hell out of me:
"Extreme rarity" "Extremely rare" Rare already covers it. Qualifying it is like putting the Deltas on double secret probation. I generally dislike the verbal diarrhea that most AH writers seem to develop. I imagine they have a menu of random adjectives they can slap them together to create a description. Like: "This impressive specimen from an ultra rare issue is the highest condition exemplar extant in the PSA database, with radiant color on the obverse and virtually unimprovable color on the back." You can attach that verbiage to nearly any card. Or anything else. Part of the problem is that the writers try to sound as erudite as possible on what I imagine is a second-rate education, which leads to some really funny sentences like this gem from Goodwin's recent auction: "If you are contemplating adding one museum quality card to your collection, this jewel certainly qualifies as a grandeur selection." WTF is a "grandeur selection"? Grandeur is a noun, as is selection. They might as well write that it qualifies as a card card.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 03-23-2015 at 07:18 PM. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
On the other end of the spectrum you have Memory Lane.....
"Get it!" "Bid to own" "Joltin' Joe" you get the idea. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What auction house......? | T205 GB | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-17-2014 03:50 PM |
| Fantasy Auction Descriptions | Runscott | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 05-20-2014 10:50 PM |
| "If he was better, maybe he would have been the best": Auction Descriptions | bn2cardz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-31-2013 01:26 AM |
| Mastro Auction Descriptions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 238 | 05-31-2007 10:29 PM |
| OT - Auction Catalog Descriptions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-14-2004 12:43 PM |