 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-06-2015, 02:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Jason--Here are the back scans in the same order as the front. The alignment is off left-to-right on Cantwell and Bivens, almost as if the sheet was fed into the press at an angle rather than straight.
Cheers, Mike
__________________
http://t209-contentnea.com Buying 1905-1915 Southern League cards, PCs, & memorabilia / T210: Series 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 8 
|
|
#2
05-06-2015, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's the O'Halloran from the same auction. At first I was thinking that there was a sheet of these that got pulled off the printer. But, unless there was space set in between each card, which I don't believe I've ever seen on a panel or strip of cards before, that couldn't be the case for the OHalloran or Cantwell. So it would have to be some sort of an advertisement perhaps?
Generally speaking, when cards are laid out in a panel or strip, there's only enough room to the left and right of each photo for that card's border. So, in theory, if the Cantwell/OHalloran were cut from a panel, you wouldn't see any white around the edges. I suppose you could make the argument that the OHalloran was the upper-left card in a panel, but even that is unlikely because we can see the rounded corners. So I think I'd have to go with advertising piece for the two Series 7s.... T210Ohalloran.jpg Last edited by shammus; 05-10-2015 at 10:47 PM.
|
|
#3
05-06-2015, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
To my knowledge no advertising piece would have printed backs. There was a large number of handcut higher series cards that were in the same auction several years back. Probably just hand cut from bad sheets
. Last edited by sb1; 05-06-2015 at 07:50 PM.
|
|
#4
05-06-2015, 08:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you're right, Scott. I don't see these as cut from an advertising sheet, but I could be wrong.
Nice card, Brian! Cheers, Mike
__________________
http://t209-contentnea.com Buying 1905-1915 Southern League cards, PCs, & memorabilia / T210: Series 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 8
|
|
#5
05-07-2015, 09:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thnx for sharing... They definitely seem hand cut... Wavy, over size border, bad angle... Reject, that was hand cut and made it out the door to someone's home. I doubt it was in a pack of smokes, but those are scrappy looking. Nice.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia
|
|
#6
05-09-2015, 08:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-09-2015 at 08:06 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T210 Oddity? | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-12-2014 11:23 AM |
| Paying well for a t209 printing error/ghost/oddity *Either Series is fine* | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-03-2014 03:23 PM |
| Needing an e93 Printing variation/blank-back/goof/oddity for my collection | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-30-2014 10:00 PM |
| Would love to add a t204 or t207 Error/Ghost/Printing Oddity to my collection... | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 07-17-2013 09:27 AM |
| Printing oddity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-28-2006 05:47 PM |
Hybrid Mode
