Proof? T206 were printed in rows of more than twelve

atx840 · #1 05-28-2015, 12:06 AM

Hey Scot,

I haven't looked at this in a while but when overlaying the PCs on a grid with T206 dimensions I am seeing consistency in horizontal & vertical spacing. The hight of the PCs are 3:4 ratio of a T206 and align perfectly with several of the Lash Bitters T206 overprints.

Width wise, its a 4:19 ratio, without any margin on the T206 side which we know there was. 17x8 could be an option.

These T206s look to have 2 different PCs overprinted, both with the front right side up and upside down as well as the reverse.

There is a lot going on to show in one animation, the cards that flash show where the overprint Lash ink aligns with the background PC. Look at the yellow gold kicker rod on the bar, Lash Bitters logo, blue jacket of smaller man, blue hat etc.

Definitely needs a lot more work.

sreader3 · #2 05-28-2015, 08:00 AM

Chris,

This is terrific.

Thanks.

Scot

Leon · #3 05-28-2015, 08:15 AM

Chris, that last display is so freaking awesome I feel like sticking this thread to the top

. Wow, is all I can say....(and great job!!)

Screw it. It's getting stickied for a while today......

t206hound · #4 05-28-2015, 09:26 AM

Hey Chris,
can you call out which cards you are using in the animation in post #52?

Jobu · #5 05-28-2015, 09:43 AM

I LOVE these Lash's Bitters cards. I tried to get the Barger when he came up but fell just short.

I wanted to add to this thread the possibility that there were two Lash's sheets and that the cards we have came from both. Schlafly has a misregistration in the gray layer that Nattress appears not to have and also has a much larger blue shift than Nattress. The other misregistrations look more or less consistent to me so I can't help but wonder if Schlafly came from a second sheet.

atx840 · #6 05-28-2015, 10:18 AM

Bryan there very well could have been two sheets, Barger doesnt quite fit next to Bliss on this sheet but possibly in the same position but lower/higher if a true sheet was 8 T206s tall.

t206hound · #7 05-28-2015, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atx840

Perhaps 17

I think you also need to align the Piedmont backs, which I don't think the Maddox does.

Quote:

Originally Posted by atx840

Chris, per earlier discussions in this thread, Maddox does not line up from a "Piedmont 350" back alignment, although the other components of the layout match. Not to make more work for you, but perhaps another frame of the animation with the Piedmont 350 backs would help.

Can you look back at my Posts #39 and #40 to see if my assumptions have been overcome by what you've learned since then?

Pat R · #8 05-28-2015, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atx840

Bryan there very well could have been two sheets, Barger doesnt quite fit next to Bliss on this sheet but possibly in the same position but lower/higher if a true sheet was 8 T206s tall.

Amazing work Chris,

There are two sheets that indicate a minimum of 11 high and one a minimum of 12 high in the plate scratches so Barger might line up higher or lower somewhere.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Post your Pictures of Stacks or Piles of Raw Cards	leftygrove10	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	44	10-06-2014 01:20 PM
Ted Williams - Stacks of Plaques	jimjim	Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports	4	03-17-2014 01:31 PM
Stacks of old Sports Illustrated Issues FS	Archive	Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T	0	12-08-2007 08:30 AM
Can trimmed cards in high grades be statistically proven?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	16	04-07-2007 09:46 AM