|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It looks like number 2 to me.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
is way too inconsistent imho....
they are all over the place......no one is perfect, but ALOT of psa inconsistencies as I have seen john vanderbeck |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would like to see a larger scan of the back, but it looks like a PSA 7 (ST) to me, based upon the scan I can't make larger.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dos.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is a personal favorite linked right below-- and why I just flat out will never personally subscribe to their grading criteria. It's like they grade the corners and surface and don't care about the image a collector is actually trying to enjoy, LOL.
Special Last edited by MattyC; 06-23-2015 at 01:28 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Speaking of 48 Leafs being off:
http://www.robertedwardauctions.com/.../2006/353.html I think Rob may have missed this one in terms of his description.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
![]() |
|
|