clearly not Bray ACC

[buchner]

I have a few short notes from Charlie Bray back in the 70's, have no idea what his printed name would look like, but his signature does not look like the name on the ACC. I'm afraid I don't have a scanner, but could supply photocopies. Henry knows me, so hopefully he'll vouch for me unless he still blames me for him losing his Indian poster. I knew Mr. Bray as I went to is house often when he had his auctions. One of the nicest persons I ever met. Hope this helps a little. John

[1880nonsports]

Always a pleasure to speak to you in between like every 10 years We should stay in touch - hmoses2@comcast.net and I think you have my phone number should your email not function! Off topic - but never know if we'' speak - guy on non-sport side just picked up a cabinet sized premium? of the gilded lily (langtry) real photo mounted on a pear's soap card. Do you still collect them (if the right thing) along with your super baseball collection?

[1880nonsports]

and looked at the listing again -I had really only concentrated on what the seller called a signature. Few other things seem a bit strange to me in going back. The owner only made a few notes (apparently inside the front cover) and they were in no way connected to the plethora of sets he would have been interested in. No notes were made on the inside pages (at least not from the scans) what would presumably be a working copy. Unless he was in love with himself and where he was in his life - someone else wrote that name on the last page. Whether he owned it or not at any point I would suppose is still up in the air. Unless the good doctor can attest that he received it from Bray - or the handwriting can be closely identified with his known handwriting - each step beyond that increases "the leap of faith". I have no problem believing what he might say - as long as there's clarity as to exactly what the contention is......

[Leon]

Originally Posted by 1880nonsports

and looked at the listing again -I had really only concentrated on what the seller called a signature. Few other things seem a bit strange to me in going back. The owner only made a few notes (apparently inside the front cover) and they were in no way connected to the plethora of sets he would have been interested in. No notes were made on the inside pages (at least not from the scans) what would presumably be a working copy. Unless he was in love with himself and where he was in his life - someone else wrote that name on the last page. Whether he owned it or not at any point I would suppose is still up in the air. Unless the good doctor can attest that he received it from Bray - or the handwriting can be closely identified with his known handwriting - each step beyond that increases "the leap of faith". I have no problem believing what he might say - as long as there's clarity as to exactly what the contention is......

Henry
I was actually going by that handwriting more than the possible signature on back but when I checked my exemplars that writing looked more like Barkers . I had coupled that with knowing Mr. Lowe and knowing he was friends with all of those guys back in the day. If it isn't a Bray copy, it's not that big of a deal to me. I always only go by what can be proven too.
At worst case I will have another copy of the 1946 ACC...... and to that I am quite clear.