![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It appears to be the same card from the original post on page one. ?.. or i've forgotten how to internet.. :-P
Last edited by sockwell123; 07-02-2015 at 10:07 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I personally would stay away from the current card on ebay for a number of reasons: 1. I don't trust high dollar cards that aren't graded. There is such a premium for graded stars that I'm always skeptical when one isn't. Usually this means it was submitted and rejected or the seller knows its not legit. 2. The colors look off to me. I compared it with my Nags and the yellow on the front looks too dark on this card and so does the blue ink on the back. Obviously there are differences in print runs that can account for slight color differences on cards but this looks like to much to me. 3. I avoid cards with blurry scans and ones that don't show all the edges (like on the back of this one). Usually they are hiding something. 4. Chicle cards are notorious for slight registration problems due to printing the image color by color. I don't see any on this card at all which is a bit troubling too. If it is fake, someone put some time into this one as its passable. What do others think? jeff Last edited by jefferyepayne; 07-03-2015 at 06:33 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My humble opinion is that this is probably not authentic.
The main red flag for me is the general blurriness and pixelation of the text on the back when using the zoom feature of the Ebay listing. When comparing it to the back texts of the Chicles in my collection (I don't have a Nagurski) using a magnifying glass to try to replicate the same scale, the text on the ones I have are much crisper and cleaner. The blurriness is probably just a shaky hand, and there's always the chance the pixelation is the result of a low resolution scan, but there is enough doubt and uncertainty on this one that I would never feel comfortable owning it, even if I got it at a very cheap price. I would be haunted by the question of whether it was authentic or not.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sold for $1,250. Someone either got completely robbed or got a great deal.
jeff |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, the last couple of beaters I saw sold for around 1500. In a PSA 3.5 or 4 holder..... who knows - 4500? One thing that hasn't been mentioned is the description. I never feel it's a good sign when a seller says: "I don't know anything about x" - not quite as common as this was my grandfather/uncle/etc.'s, but it's right up there.
Last edited by TanksAndSpartans; 07-04-2015 at 09:24 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There were lots of reasons to stay away from the last card linked, but notice how the corner wear reveals white card stock. Thats a dead giveaway. That and the colors are way off. The gray or off white border color is printed onto white stock.
__________________
My photobucket :http://s1297.photobucket.com/user/jd...%20Cut%20Autos |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bogus autographs on Ebay | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 07-05-2013 03:07 PM |
Bogus Doublefolds on eBay | Bocabirdman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 05-16-2013 08:35 PM |
Football - 1930s Vintage Programs & Photos end Tonight Sept. 5 Ebay BRONKO NAGURSKI + | D. Bergin | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 09-05-2010 09:25 AM |
Bogus Nodgrass on ebay | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-02-2009 10:31 AM |
Anything Being Done By eBay @ Bogus Cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-17-2005 01:18 PM |