![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
bummer!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's what I'd half expect when soaking an album.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
hen.ry Mo/ses
![]() I would venture that EVERYONE INVOLVED IN HAVING THE ALBUM KNEW THEY WOULDN'T SOAK WELL. P.E.R.I.O.D.! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Welllllllll...atleast you still have some of the most beautiful and cherished cards in the hobby.
I was quoting the goodwin description! Last edited by ullmandds; 07-07-2015 at 03:29 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ght=Scrap+book
Knew I'd seen it before Agree with Pete. Still some real nice fronts. Last edited by Econteachert205; 07-07-2015 at 02:49 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Very interesting _____________________________ well I'm putting my name in my post hen.ry Mo/ses I would venture that EVERYONE INVOLVED IN HAVING THE ALBUM KNEW THEY WOULDN'T SOAK WELL. P.E.R.I.O.D.! ______________________________ Sadly, I'm beginning to feel the same. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Hmmm - not so good - sorry to hear about your results Scott.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We've had quite a few collectors post here that they would NEVER attempt to soak cards. Given that consignors to auction houses often are even less knowledgeable than we are about such things, it's quite a leap to assume that the consignor knew that the cards would not soak off the pages.
It's reasonable to assume that the original owner back in the day simply chose a glue that wouldn't soak - does anyone here really think that someone in 1912 would intentionally seek out a type of glue for their scrapbook that either was or was not water-soluble? They chose glue to make their cards stick to the pages, not thinking about collectors 100 years in the future. If they abused their cards by flipping, trading or any other method, they could easily be creased or worn at the time they were glued in. Conspiracy theories work much better for today's modern money-oriented people than for 1912's simpler card collectors who weren't worried about investment value of every single item they came across.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would guess, given the creases throughout the pile and comparing them to the scans of the pages, that there were previous attempts to remove them. I cannot believe that anyone would have cards that creased up and decide to scrapbook them.......
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Baseball scrap book with original photos | HOFautosChris | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 03-04-2014 05:43 PM |
1935 Boston Globe Scrap Book | eliminator | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-16-2012 07:45 AM |
O/T'ish- 1930s Baguer Chocolate scrap book- Zoo animals | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-09-2012 07:13 AM |
Old Scrap Book Over 175 pages | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-12-2007 09:19 AM |
More severe than the scrap book capers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-15-2003 07:30 AM |