|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Intent to deceive. I agree 100%.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Back to topic , is there sufficient evidence to conclude the E93s have been altered? Pretty bold statement by an experienced and respected board member.
I would like to see some veteran members chime in with a " yes" or " no" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ritter was chemically cleaned 6 years ago.
Seller never mentioned that fact in their auction. Last edited by Jantz; 07-09-2015 at 06:20 PM. Reason: :) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Where is the outrage? I am somewhat outraged...but what can be done?
This whole situation reminds me of the PED's in baseball. For many years this was ignored...accolades were celebrated. Seemingly when certain hallowed records became in reach and or broken people started to take notice. And changes were made. But in that time PED's became harder and harder to detect...when one became detectable a new one came around that was not. I imagine tons and tons of money was poured into this by major-league baseball to control the situation better. If this problem with in the hobby were to be remedied it would also require lots and lots of financial investment and technology...and for what? A handful of us on a vintage baseball card message board feeling better about the hobby that we love? Most registry heads and casual collectors could not care less if their cards have been altered. How many trimmed/altered/overgraded cards do we see in high-grade holders selling for huge sums of money. I just don't think enough people really care and there is enough money to invest to remedy the problem. Last edited by ullmandds; 07-09-2015 at 08:49 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pete my guess is that if law enforcement put its mind to it, some perpetrators could be taken down. Maybe it's even happening as we speak. As we have seen on this very thread, people keep documents that could assist such an endeavor.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But I will not huff and puff I will not jump up-and-down in outrage. My reaction to all of this is to do my due diligence...by examining cards with a high magnification loupe, a black light...Learning as much as I can about card alterations and such, occasionally getting help from my friends... and by not paying large sums of money for highly graded cards...I hope to avoid this shady side of the hobby. Last edited by ullmandds; 07-09-2015 at 09:04 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would much rather them focus such efforts in this industry towards finding people who rebuild corners, reback, recolor, reprint, stamp new backs, reseal packs, falsify slabs, etc. I spend a decent sum of money on cards and those things bother me. If I bought a card for $200,000 and someone had removed a stain from it that wasn't supposed to be there in the first place, I don't give a damn. This particular issue is and always has been a gray area in the hobby. I would imagine it'd be tough to make it black and white in the legal system not to mention having to find substantial evidence. As this thread has shown, people will have their opinions and more than likely stick to them. There's not a chemical to remove those.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would certainly like to see those people nailed as well. No disagreement here. It was however, until now, beyond our subject matter. But now that you have raised it, I suspect there is an overlap in part between folks who do some of those things you despise and folks who do the things that don't bother you but do bother some of us. I think some of our card doctors are multi talented.
As for legality, where PSA clearly says it won't slab cards with stains removed (you may disagree, I get that), and people remove stains with the intent of getting them past PSA, and then they are sold without disclosure and people buy them expecting they have not been altered under PSA's standards, that's black and white enough for me. And if people are keeping invoices of the work they did, it shouldn't be that hard to prove.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 07-09-2015 at 10:03 PM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
1
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-09-2015 at 11:53 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS 51 Cards 1970 Topps All High Numbers High Grade! | Northviewcats | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-12-2014 02:53 PM |
| 1956 Mickey Mantle PSA 7 Rare HIGH END HIGH Grade | CollectiblesNJ | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 49 | 07-18-2013 02:31 PM |
| For Trade My High Grade T206s for Your High Grade Cobb Portraits | RGold | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 11-28-2012 07:37 PM |
| Mile High- T 209 Set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-02-2008 02:13 PM |
| High-grade E93s Wanted | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2006 09:22 AM |