|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, a second quality grader is paramount to the hobby. Coins have NGC and PCGS, generally people prefer PCGS and their items sell for little more, but NGC right on their heels and very respectable.
SGC does need some bona fide step up in marketing. Biggest thing is, like the stock market, you make your money when you buy. You can pony up big for PSA, but will it yield profits when you sell? Be careful. Paying less for SGC can yield profits too. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Honestly I don't think either grading company (PSA vs SGC) is any better than the other. And like many here have said, PSA probably has a larger following at this point due to their set registry. Probably does make more sense if you have a T206, 1933 Goudey, or a 1941 Play Ball.
My question for the non-main stream T206 collector however. Would you equally pay just as much money and be just as comfortable for the most part buying a T206 with a Drum back? Would anyone getting a Drum graded these days just plain be better off going to PSA? If so, this is a far cry from the way things were on this board even five years ago. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I still seeing PSA outpacing SGC graded cards for the most part....i do agree with leon that mid grade drums t206 type of cards are pretty similar....its been more than 6 months since the last post...anything change?
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 04-03-2016 at 07:38 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
So let me get this strait, PSA won't swap over SGC cards? If so, why not just crack open the holder and send in raw. If the card is graded properly, wouldn't PSA grade it as such? I have several SGC card none over $300 that I was planning on sending to PSA. Should I be worried that they would not ease them at all or grade them out the same the SGC once did?
__________________
Seeking Knowledge from all the old guys on Net54 before they get senile and forget!
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 04-03-2016 at 08:04 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
You could send them to PSA still in the SGC holder and pay a "crossover" rate which is more expensive then a straight grade for a raw card. Many people including myself think that you get a biased opinion doing it this way as PSA seems to have a tendency to give you a grade below SGC's holder. Best way is to crack and submit raw (although over the last 18 months I've received about the same results doing it this way as well). I think overall PSA grades .5 to 1 grade stricter across the board.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #7 all-time. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scary | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-04-2011 10:50 AM |
| Looked Very Scary to me... | Northviewcats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-28-2011 12:37 PM |
| SGC problem - Scary for me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 01-14-2008 08:08 AM |
| Pretty scary.................. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-23-2006 03:30 PM |
| this is scary | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-02-2005 01:38 PM |