 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
07-29-2015, 12:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The MK qualifier is more for something like a pen or pencil mark, or writing on the card. I think there's more of a chance to get an ST qualifier. If this were my card I wouldn't try to cross and would keep as is. You could send it in the SGC holder with a minimum grade of 5 requested, but my guess is you would get it back in the same holder and be out the grading and shipping fees.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 06:30 PM |
| PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 07:04 PM |
| Should PSA/SGC have a qualifier for Centering? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-22-2011 10:57 AM |
| How is T206 not an MC Qualifier? | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-10-2010 12:28 PM |
| How did they miss the PD qualifier on this one? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-25-2002 06:16 PM |
Threaded Mode