![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure if this will help, but just in case...
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Luke...silly question....Have you measured it?
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know squat about trimmed cards, but why would anyone trim this card to its current condition? You'd think that if someone trimmed a card it would look like a PSA 8 (a la Gretzky Wagner).
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Some HOF players but others: Griffith - Downey - Mullen - Camnitz - $SOLD Reulbach - $SOLD Mordecai Brown Cubs jersey- $SOLD Tinker bat on - $TRADED So the point is why trim a Downey, Mullen, Camnitz, or Reulbach ???
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you have it in hand? If you do here's what to look for.
From the front - All the edges should be slightly rounded towards the back. On the back - All the edges should have a slight ridge sticking up. If it's like that with no inconsistencies then it's probably not trimmed. If any of the edges are sharp and crisp, like a late 80's early 90's card then it's probably trimmed. Steve B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bottom edge looks ever so slightly uneven (very hard to see). The corners look a little funky almost as if it was very slightly trimmed. Check the bottom border for straightness. Maybe it is just my eyes and my age!
![]() Peace, Mike Last edited by vthobby; 08-04-2015 at 10:26 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll be the dissenter then. It looks good to me.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have to admit I've never measured a T206. There seems to be so much variation that I'm not sure how much value an exact measurement has. Is that the wrong way to look at it?
I did compare it to other raw cards and it was very similar to my other raw cards, and matched up perfectly with quite a few that I don't have concerns about. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Another silly question:
Can a trimmed card still meet the commonly accepted/published card dimensions of 1-7/16" by 2-5/8 as specified on the PSA website)? Remember the PSA 5 "Jumbo" Honus Wagner T206? That card could be trimmed and still meet the specs. ![]()
__________________
Successful transactions with the-illini, Kawika, irishdenny, iwantitiwinit, AddieJoss. Last edited by auggiedoggy; 08-04-2015 at 08:55 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by Bocabirdman; 08-04-2015 at 08:56 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would you be able to detect a trimmed T206 card that was, as trimmed, properly sized? | esquiresports | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-12-2013 10:52 AM |
what to do with a trimmed card | abothebear | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 05-01-2011 03:10 PM |
does this card look trimmed to you? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-31-2008 03:12 PM |
trimmed card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-06-2003 07:17 PM |
this card looks like it may have been Trimmed.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-18-2002 06:05 PM |