Mastro sentencing update

WhenItWasAHobby · #1 08-10-2015, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

AMarshall Fogel, a former prosecutor,
practicing attorney, and nationally known collector of baseball memorabilia for more than 25
years, witnessed the growth of the sports memorabilia industry from its early beginnings. (Ex.
3). He credits Bill with transforming a �nascent struggling hobby� into the �thriving $100
million per year industry� that it is today. �

Reading through all of the testimonials, I find this statement highlighted in bold as being more damaging than obviously intended. I love participating in nascent struggling hobbies rather than high-dollar mature industries any day of the week.

nolemmings · #2 08-10-2015, 03:02 PM

Seems to me Bill was more interested in dealing with a nescient and not nascent hobby.

Peter_Spaeth · #3 08-10-2015, 03:15 PM

I don't know what that word means, I guess that makes me nescient.

Runscott · #4 08-10-2015, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby

Reading through all of the testimonials, I find this statement highlighted in bold as being more damaging than obviously intended. I love participating in nascent struggling hobbies rather than high-dollar mature industries any day of the week.

He saw an industry with un-tapped potential, which needed a few questionable jump-start techniques in order for guys like himself, Marshall and James to realize their own personal financial potential (they were all "nascent" as well).

vintagewhitesox · #5 08-10-2015, 04:18 PM

I practice in that building and in front of that judge often.
I take a slightly different view, but I understand the ire and anger towards Mastro for what he has done to this hobby.

His lawyers are just acting as zealous advocates for their client. Under the federal sentencing guidelines, a judge can consider both the actual federal guidelines (ussc.gov), as well as something called the "3553(a)" factors, which are characteristics of the defendant that the guidelines don't consider. These factors include the nature and circumstances of the offense, the personal history of the defendant, the risk of recidivism and harm to the public.

I have countless times given character letters to judges recounting my clients good deeds and selfless acts, despite being convicted of drug and gun trafficking, human trafficking, and also wire and health care fraud. The important thing is to sentence the entire person, not just the act for which he's plead guilty.
In that sense, I understand where his attorneys' are coming from. As a collector and someone who has bid in mastro's auctions, is disappointing, to say the least.

travrosty · #6 08-10-2015, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagewhitesox

I practice in that building and in front of that judge often.
I take a slightly different view, but I understand the ire and anger towards Mastro for what he has done to this hobby.

His lawyers are just acting as zealous advocates for their client. Under the federal sentencing guidelines, a judge can consider both the actual federal guidelines (ussc.gov), as well as something called the "3553(a)" factors, which are characteristics of the defendant that the guidelines don't consider. These factors include the nature and circumstances of the offense, the personal history of the defendant, the risk of recidivism and harm to the public.

I have countless times given character letters to judges recounting my clients good deeds and selfless acts, despite being convicted of drug and gun trafficking, human trafficking, and also wire and health care fraud. The important thing is to sentence the entire person, not just the act for which he's plead guilty.
In that sense, I understand where his attorneys' are coming from. As a collector and someone who has bid in mastro's auctions, is disappointing, to say the least.

There are just so many, good, decent human traffickers out there, this makes me puke.

Peter_Spaeth · #7 08-10-2015, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travrosty

There are just so many, good, decent human traffickers out there, this makes me puke.

Then change the system. Under ours, a criminal defendant has a right to counsel, and counsel has an ethical obligation to represent the defendant zealously within the bounds of the law. There is nothing at all wrong with what Josh does, or what Mastro's lawyers did in this case (unless they misrepresented something).

buymycards · #8 08-10-2015, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Then change the system. Under ours, a criminal defendant has a right to counsel, and counsel has an ethical obligation to represent the defendant zealously within the bounds of the law. There is nothing at all wrong with what Josh does, or what Mastro's lawyers did in this case (unless they misrepresented something).

There may not be anything illegal about what Josh does, but yes, there are many things wrong with it.

Peter_Spaeth · #9 08-10-2015, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buymycards

There may not be anything illegal about what Josh does, but yes, there are many things wrong with it.

Tell that to the people who wrote the Bill of Rights.

Kenny Cole · #10 08-10-2015, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Then change the system. Under ours, a criminal defendant has a right to counsel, and counsel has an ethical obligation to represent the defendant zealously within the bounds of the law. There is nothing at all wrong with what Josh does, or what Mastro's lawyers did in this case (unless they misrepresented something).

Peter is absolutely right. Reading what Mastro's attorneys say makes me want to puke too, but that is what their job is. Every criminal defendant has the right to zealous representation, irrespective of how heinous the crime is that they are charged with. Period. End of story. That's the way it works and that's the way it was designed to work by our founders for a multitude of good and sufficient reasons.

Back to the topic at hand, those who are aggrieved by Mastro's actions have the job of writing the judge and informing him why they believe he deserves a harsher penalty than Mastro's attorneys are requesting. I haven't looked at the docket sheet recently, but based on what I've read here, it sure seems like Mastro's lawyers are performing their obligation of zealously representing their client and many of those who feel aggrieved by Mastro's actions are doing, shall I say, a less than stellar job of zealously informing the judge why they think Mastro should get more than the proverbial slap on the wrist. As Jeff has previously indicated, the judge is unlikely to read this web site, so let him know your feelings via letter or quit your bitching.

buymycards · #11 08-10-2015, 07:57 PM

[QUOTE=Kenny Cole;1440636]Peter is absolutely right. Reading what Mastro's attorneys say makes me want to puke too, but that is what their job is. Every criminal defendant has the right to zealous representation, irrespective of how heinous the crime is that they are charged with. Period. End of story. That's the way it works and that's the way it was designed to work by our founders for a multitude of good and sufficient reasons.

Unless they are broke. Then their representation isn't quite so zealous.

Sorry, my faith in the legal system is non-existent. End of story.

travrosty · #12 08-10-2015, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Then change the system. Under ours, a criminal defendant has a right to counsel, and counsel has an ethical obligation to represent the defendant zealously within the bounds of the law. There is nothing at all wrong with what Josh does, or what Mastro's lawyers did in this case (unless they misrepresented something).

I didn't say they can't represent them or defend them, but to put in a good word for a human trafficker and hit the highlights on how great a human being they are, i mean, c'mon.

Peter_Spaeth · #13 08-10-2015, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travrosty

I didn't say they can't represent them or defend them, but to put in a good word for a human trafficker and hit the highlights on how great a human being they are, i mean, c'mon.

Yes, absolutely. It's Josh's job to put the best possible face on the defendant, not to do a half-ass job because he is repulsed by him. Judges (or juries if it's a death penalty case) can sort it out.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bill Mastro's upcoming sentencing	calvindog	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	334	07-15-2015 07:21 AM
NY Daily News: Lew Lipset plans to publish another book (plus Bill Mastro update)	WhenItWasAHobby	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	22	04-28-2014 10:50 AM
Update - 7 more top picks posted - Mastro Collection	CarltonHendricks	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	0	12-07-2010 06:27 AM
Mastro Just So update	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	1	06-01-2003 10:42 PM
MASTRO update ... I am pulling out ...	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	21	04-15-2002 04:46 PM