Last card - 1965 Topps completed

[Vintagevault13]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Congrats, Ed on finishing 65 and go oh hunting on the 52s



65 & 75...why 52 and not 55 ?

Al,

To be honest, collecting 1955 Topps would probably make more sense for many reasons (prices, great rookies, smaller #). I definitely considered that possibility. I always come back to the 52's. As a kid, the 1952 set just seemed mythical and unattainable to me. I have always enjoyed history, and reading about the 1952 set when I was young established it in my mind as "the set". Trust me, I have often tried to talk myself out of it. In fact, this is the third time I have begun the 1952 set. The other two times I sold the cards I had, except for my HOFers. No matter what, I keep coming back to these cards. I guess I am just fascinated with the set, even with all of it's flaws (pricey, lots of no-names and coaches).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[sox1903wschamp]

Congrats on the 65 set completion. 65 is a great set.

[Zach Wheat]

Congrats Ed. What an accomplishment. Just curious as to your impression of how dififcult it was to obtain the hi nums versus another set like the 67's...

Z

[Vintagevault13]

Originally Posted by Zach Wheat

Congrats Ed. What an accomplishment. Just curious as to your impression of how dififcult it was to obtain the hi nums versus another set like the 67's...



Z

This is the only 60's set I have completed so I don't have personal experience with the high #s from other set.s. For my 65 set, I didn't find the high #s terribly difficult. The toughest I recall were Mel Stottlemyre, Bob Uecker, and Jesus Alou. Most high # commons were readily available in the $3-6 range for VG-EX. Many of the hi # rookie cards were a little tough to find at a good price. There is a good crop of rookies in the 65 set. I had to especially be patient with the Steve Carlton, Catfish Hunter, Tony Perez and Tug McGraw rookie cards. From what I have read about the 1967's, the 1965 high numbers are definitely easier.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[7nohitter]

Congrats, Ed. '65 is a beautiful set, I love the Yaz in that set.

I'm getting pretty close to the completion of the '57 set...I highly recommend that one!

[Vintagevault13]

Originally Posted by 7nohitter

Congrats, Ed. '65 is a beautiful set, I love the Yaz in that set.

I'm getting pretty close to the completion of the '57 set...I highly recommend that one!

Thanks Andrew. The 1957 set is one of my favorites. Love the scenes of the old ballparks in the background of many of the cards.

[cardsfan73]

Great job completing the set! I love the way the Cardinals cards look in this set too. Good luck with the 52 Topps!

Scott

[obctom]

Originally Posted by Zach Wheat

Congrats Ed. What an accomplishment. Just curious as to your impression of how dififcult it was to obtain the hi nums versus another set like the 67's...

Z

Forgive me for hijacking this (briefly), but of the 60's sets, I still need to complete high numbers for '67, '66, and '61. For me, the '65 high numbers were easy. And in my experience the level of difficulty - from "most difficult to least", goes '67, '66, and then '61. I would rate the '62 high numbers about equal to the '61's in difficulty, with '63 and '65 the least difficult (minus the '63 Rose of course). Disclaimer: I'm not a condition-sensitive collector, so I can't speak to the level of difficulty finding pristine EX to EX-MT cards.

(Not counting the '68's and '69's; been so long since I completed those I can't really compare.)

We now return you to your regular thread :-)

Tom

[ALR-bishop]

Well ok, Tom, we we will look the other way this one time

Appreciate the observations