|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brian I think that has more to do w/ the game cards manufactured rounded corners.
There's a bunch of National Game & Tom Barkers in high grade too but since each card is different it makes them seem scarce. What year or era do you think the Lajoie set is from? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know a lot of people are going to laugh, but I would say the 1960s given the print on the back and type of paper. I am not a paper expert, but the print and the texture of the paper I do not associate with the early 1900s.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Perhaps someone on the board can attest to having seen one before 1960.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is 1966 close enough? I was given 2 Blues (no Reds) by a close, and much older, relative.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I won a set w/ the original box a decade or so ago from Lelands
Had 50 cards enclosed. Here's a scan of a box w/ instructions, it looks period to me. This scan has the blue tinted version, mine was the red tinted version. W/ most of the cards being in high grade. Had them graded by PSA and I got grades from 4's to 10's. W/ the lower graded ones having wrinkles in them.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay,
I appreciate the picture, but the print and the paper on the back for me weigh heavier than the box. As for 1966, Paul, that would be good if for no other reason that was the year I was born. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
While I think this is a bit of a silly argument and I feel like I am being tricked into a 9/11 conspiracy conversation, I have only one thing to add -
It is accepted and documented this game was produced from 1913 to around the early 30s. It was made by a huge game company so the production numbers were likely large meaning good examples if it was not really a fun game in great shape are logical. What is illogical is that a marketing or production exec in the 60's, in a time of mega baseball stars like Mantle. Could somehow get the green light to produce a game and hope to sell to kids with Nap Lajoie as it's subject. That's all I got, other than the feeling I just got "punked".
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
The assumption that the game was marketed for kids is also off base. Many simple tabletop baseball games were indeed meant
for children, but period advertisements for numbers like National-American were placed not in child-oriented publications but in Baseball Magazine, The Sporting News, and other periodicals aimed at adults, and often showed the game being played by well-dressed adult men as if at some gentlemen's club.
__________________
-- the three idiots at Baseball Games https://baseballgames.dreamhosters.com/ https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/baseballgames/ Successful transactions with: bocabirdman, GrayGhost, jimivintage, Oneofthree67, orioles93, quinnsryche, thecatspajamas, ValKehl Last edited by Butch7999; 09-19-2015 at 10:24 AM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Must be a slow day on eBay for horrible reprints to post about here...
![]() Edit - dammit, had the window open for a bit and Rob beat me to the punch on the joke... Last edited by scooter729; 09-19-2015 at 10:55 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just checked the PSA pops of the three 1913 game sets, Lajoie, National Game & Tom Barker.
Seems that the Lajoie set has fewer graded than the other two. Not sure if SGC's pop is in line. Lajoie has 308 graded w/ 163 PSA-9's & 10's National Game - 2279 w/ 602 9's &10's Tom Barker - 1113 w/ 270 9's & 10's |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay,
Maybe the one way to get a definitive answer would be to contact Parker Brothers who is now owned by Hasbro. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just checked the SGC pops
Lajoie 253 graded w/ 113 SGC-96/98's Nat'l Game 602 w/ 115 SGC-96/98's Tom Barker 440 w/ 64 SGC-96's (No 98's) Based on the pops of PSA & SGC for these three 1913 game sets, the Lajoie set has the fewer graded examples by far |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay,
My concern is not about population reports, but why so many survived in so good of shape. Now, I see on the rules for the "game" it says copyright 1913. I also have to wonder if the cards and the rules are from one and the same game. I am not an expert on games. My worry is about the print on the back, the paper and the high number of high quality cards from the set. Admittedly, the ones you have in the picture exhibit some wear, but the ones generally offered are in high quality. This doesn't usually happen with 102 year old cards. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I used to own a set of (48? of) them, along with the original packaging. The box was in poor condition, but the cards were probably all in the ex-nm range. I've never doubted the date of origin. If each of the original owners had 48 or more of them, and they had rounded corners to begin with (the cards, not the owners), and the game was even moderately popular, it's unsurprising to me that it would be easy to find nice copies 100 years later.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1913 Nap Lajoie Card Game PSA 9 | Gobucsmagic74 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-04-2014 07:29 PM |
| SOLD: 1913 Lajoie Game Card(s) | Rob D. | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 11-15-2013 08:11 PM |
| FS: 1913 Nap Lajoie Card Game RED PSA 8...price drop! | jimivintage | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 06-24-2013 08:32 PM |
| 1913 National Game Lajoie PSA 7 (Sold) | TheBig6 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-11-2013 12:25 PM |
| 1913 Nap LaJoie game -- checklist? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-06-2005 09:40 AM |