Question on 1910-12 Sweet Caporal pins

[edhans]

I would respectfully disagree with Aaron's assesment on both counts. The fronts do indeed look great, but P2s, like S74 white silks, should be considered incomplete without the paper backing. I also think the rust or corrosion damage does materially affect the value. Another common problem, which yours do not exhibit, is brown foxing on the celluloid fronts. Nice examples from an interesting set. Enjoy them, regardless of value.

[btcarfagno]

Is it worth it to get pins graded? Monetarily I mean. I just picked up a group of 6 Cracker Jack pins from 1930 and some of them seem to be in terrific shape. Is it worth it to get them graded or should I just sell as is?

Sorry for the thread hijack. Pin threads don't come up too often and I didn't think this warranted a new thread.

Tom C

[batsballsbases]

Originally Posted by edhans

I would respectfully disagree with Aaron's assesment on both counts. The fronts do indeed look great, but P2s, like S74 white silks, should be considered incomplete without the paper backing. I also think the rust or corrosion damage does materially affect the value. Another common problem, which yours do not exhibit, is brown foxing on the celluloid fronts. Nice examples from an interesting set. Enjoy them, regardless of value.

I to tend to agree with Ed about condition. If you are collecting just for the sake of it than collect what you like. But the old adage still holds true condition is everything.. Stick to ones like your Duffy, no foxing(spots on the front) no cracks in the celluloid (front covering) try and keep away from heavy rusting on the rims as it does tend to bleed into the pin. Back papers intact. For some reason people tend to try and take out the P2 back paper.


Also of note for Tom C. dont try and wipe the cracker jack pins with any water or try and clean them as the ink that was used was water soluble and after a few wipes you will lose the whole front !