 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-08-2015, 07:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1952
Hey Mike, that's as good or better than some included in the H&S super set, but is one on left a gray back ?
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 10-08-2015 at 07:52 PM. 
|
|
#2
10-09-2015, 08:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't think to look at the back....
Quote:
...alas it's off-almond semi-amber creamy-ish......on the bright side , the back is actually fairly well-centered , which of itself makes it a condition rarity. Price just went up, thanks. ..
|
|
#3
10-11-2015, 07:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#5
10-12-2015, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1952
Just looks like a typical brown noser to me
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
