![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
How many of the mid-series grey backs does your brother have in the binder ie cards 131-190? Z |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My impression was that the discovery of a 146 House Gray Back Yellow Tiger error pretty much proved that the grays and whites were made at the same time and place, and bolstered the theory that the gray backs simply exist because there was leftover gray card stock that they used up along with the new white stock.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
House aside, the Lemke blog, including his interviews with several long term 52 collectors, also seems to debunk the Canadian theory. But it is not just the card stock that differs. The gray fronts seem significantly different than the cream fronts, and as indicated in the blog, there seem to be two different front versions of the grays. The might at least indicate two different printers or sources.
On the House yellow tiger, it seems to exist in cream and gray. Does someone if that is also true of the version which is yellow but has a red tongue ? And can the yellow or yellow/red version be found with both different front versions of the gray backs ? Last edited by ALR-bishop; 10-13-2015 at 11:13 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And then on top of all that, there is the mystery of just why the Pete Reiser card is so much more scarce than the rest?
And as an aside, that nearly complete set of gray backs for sale on REA (59 out of 60, missing only the Reiser) is up to $12,000 with four days left! I wonder how much it'd be up to if it DID have the Reiser? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The cream-back House "yellow logo" exists in several levels of purity--from red tongue to pink to less that pink to gone. The two or three gray-back yellow logo Houses I have seen seem to be devoid of red. I assume in the cream-back case, the printer was gradually running out of red ink during the printing process. If the latter is true, then the gray stock was used during the end of the run when the red was gone. It seems like it had to be one printer. How likely is it that two machines ran out of red ink? IF all that is true, it would suggest that the cream stock was used before the gray stock.
Regarding the Reiser, I have not heard any good reason about the shortage. It is certainly possible, but not probable, that this card had a tougher life than others (beat to crap, lost, pasted to scrapbooks, collected by relatives, etc). I think it more likely that there are a bunch out there in raw condition, just waiting for the right time. That is what happened with Maxwell, Rogovin, Post, etc. They are still rare, but several raw ones have appeared in the last year. So, bottom line, I think the Reiser is an artificial shortage that may or may not resolve itself. BTW, in case anyone has a spare Reiser, I have a PSA 4 gray/yellow House.... Bill |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think Bill is right. I believe, from my conversation with my father and a few of his old dealer buddies, that there are quite a few raw ones left out there. I made a find of 14 in the old store stock from the Austin store, mixed in with the regular 52's and still have the San Antonio store stock and "collection" to look through.
__________________
I am not tech savvy... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does anyone know the position of the Reiser on the sheet? Was it a corner card?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1952 Topps PSA 8.5 Bob Feller and more... | wilkcards | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2010 12:18 AM |
1952 Topps PSA rarities live on ebay! | wilkcards | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 1 | 01-15-2010 10:13 PM |
WTT Vintage for Vintage (40'-60's) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 02-01-2009 04:31 PM |
Let's see your Rare 1952 T mid-series GRAY backs ? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 12-03-2007 11:14 AM |
1952 Topps For Sale High #'s | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-08-2007 02:41 PM |