 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
10-26-2015, 12:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps Slightly Off-Center
 ....In order to build a complete but decently-centered 1957 Topps set several years ago , I wound up buying several large collections and a few partial sets in order to cut down on the eventual cost......these are among the worst backs I culled , and I'm offering them for your viewing pleasure.....enjoy... ..neat thing about the Walker Cooper card : no space left for any comments after posting his major league statistics.....only card in the set like that....the Ted Williams card would have been the same except that they compressed the stats for "1943-1945" into one line , commenting on his military service... . 
|
|
#3
10-26-2015, 03:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1957
Maybe because of DPs, but even on correctly cut 57s you can find the same card with different relationships between the baseball stitching and the numbers on the back. For example on one card the stitching may touch or even protrude into the number but on a different card of the same player there is a gap between the stitching and the number. I don't have an example currently scanned but picked up a couple after sliphorn here on the board pointed some out to me.
sliphorn, like saved and Cliff, needs more diversions in his life :-) Last edited by ALR-bishop; 10-26-2015 at 03:22 PM.
|
|
#4
10-27-2015, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The relation between the number and stitching is probably a registration thing.
Not that it couldn't be different, and considering Topps attention to detail probably is. The place to look would be the relation of the number to the rest of the red. If it's located differently there it's not registration. * Steve B *Ok, it could technically be registration IF Topps printed the numbers and the rest of the red separately. No reason they would, and I've never seen any thing to make me think they did, but ....it IS Topps 
|
|
#5
10-30-2015, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
11-04-2015, 07:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Two More Anomalies
The 1964 #76 has a small vertical line to the left of #44 and this is the common as I have seen 10 with it and just this one without the line.
The 1964 #13 Phillies team has many of these cards with this line kind of faded out at the lower left. They are all over the place on eBay and COMC. Last edited by Sliphorn; 11-05-2015 at 10:39 AM. Reason: Wrong Year
|
|
#7
11-04-2015, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1963
1964 on 76
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-04-2015 at 09:53 PM.
|
|
#8
11-11-2015, 08:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Comc
I wanted to alert variations and errors collectors that, for the second time, I did not receive the card from Check Out My Cards that was shown. It was a Deans card. The reply I got from COMC was:
We were able to follow up on this card with Dean's. The copy of the card had double sold. When this happens, Dean's sends a copy with the same or higher grade to replace it. If you are unhappy with the card, please return it for a full refund. Here is an example with 1957 #119 STan Lopata: COMC item # 19525890 eBay 1957 Topps #119 Stan Lopata GOOD N17599 Tell me that this is not the same card. I hope that none of you gets cheated with this.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 07:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 12:52 PM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 05:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 08:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 08:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
