![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buyers premiums are steep, correct. Sellers fees are steep, correct. But those fees being as high and the independent sellers/auction houses as they are protect each of us from the shill bidding and assets protection strategies many of you complain about here.
If fees were lower, problems far greater than each of you could imagine would certainly exist. If I didn't have to pay my bill when I won something nor did I have to pay a big buyers premium, I would most likely do more "asset protection" as would most others. The fees are high, I agree, but they are most certainly there for a reason. Any auction house that charges less than standard rates would immediately be a HUGE red flag to me and most other large buyers I assume. Most importantly, these large transaction costs make both buyers and sellers think seriously about transacting. If you are a buyer, you buy hopefully for the long term. If you are a seller, you likely consider the transaction costs in your investment return analysis. The fee structures as they are encourage long term investing rather than short term speculation. Although expensive, the model has sustained the test of time because it works on many levels. It critically encourages collectors and investors alike to make purchases they intend to commit to for long periods of time. By its very nature, this commitment buy the parties to a transaction support prices for our large investments in cardboard. You might wish for the "good ole days", but trust me, the market fee structure as it is today is exactly what each of us need for the market to function in an orderly and proper fashion. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Is that the "protection" you're crowing about? By the way, why do you get to post anonymously? Did you get some special dispensation from Leon? Bill Last edited by bcornell; 11-10-2015 at 08:48 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
No beef with you, although I could not possibly care less about people policing eBay. Bill |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
More posters isn't necessarily worse. But, in this case, it absolutely is. Bill |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I dunno, mandatng your full name be in public is being held somewhat accountable. (It's in bold type at the top of every page.) No two people would moderate a forum the same way. There can't be a perfect way in as much as you can't please everyone.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is Wonka really banned?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I spoken enough of my mind for the evening and for a while. Take care guys... I'll check back periodically, but don't expect me to post or contribute often. Justin |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upcoming PWCC Auction - T206 Red Portrait Ty Cobb | mantleman | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 09-08-2015 03:21 PM |
FS: Green Ty Cobb PSA 4 Green Cy Young PSA 6 | 1952boyntoncollector | T206 cards B/S/T | 19 | 06-18-2015 09:47 PM |
Accepting Offers T205 Cobb MathewsonT206 Cobb Green and Red | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 01-12-2009 04:17 PM |
WOW - The prices of baseball related cigarette packs are through the roof. | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 06-30-2007 09:45 PM |
Vintage prices through the roof... can you say Dog Ears? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-11-2005 09:37 PM |