|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think this is any kind of shocking revelation that PSA sells for more than SGC in any set where there is a decent number of registry collectors. I am kicking myself for not at least putting in a snipe on the SGC 50 1915 Matty Cracker Jack card that closed at $1,213 on eBay a couple days ago. The 1915 Matty CJ is one of my white whales, but I didn't bid or put in a snipe because it was already at $900 with several days remaining and I figured it would close far out of my budget.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1915-Cracker...vip=true&rt=nc Last edited by Bored5000; 11-13-2015 at 12:51 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you want subgraded cards then PSA is your company. I stick with SGC because of their grading standards. I dont agree with all of their grades but PSA is pathetic. When I sell an SGC graded card, I always suggest you send it off to PSA for a higher grade because of their substandard grading. P.S. I usually try to buy a higher graded PSA card because when I break it out of its slab and resubmit to SGC, usually it comes back a grade lower.
Last edited by cammb; 12-03-2015 at 12:47 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
No I wont. When I decide to sell my SGC 84 (7)I will break it out and submit it to PSA where I will get an 8!!!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
if that were the case they would sell for a lpt more than they currently do because the dealers that make a living at this would be bidding heavily for the sgc cards to breakout submit to psa and make bank. i am not saying it doesnt happen and that their are not some poorly graded psa cards but i find sgc to be more lenient on condition than psa in many cases. Pretending every sgc card is a grade or more higher in a psa holder is laughable. in fact there are several dealers that switched to sgc because they were not getting enough high grades from psa.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my opinion, it used to be that for the most part PSA and SGC graded about the same, except maybe SGC was a little easier on centering, and stricter on paper loss and wrinkles.
Now, it seems SGC at least on prewar has becomes much looser about corner wear (I see cards with rounded corners in 5s which I find troubling). At the 6-8 grades they still seem to grade pretty much as I would. PSA, on the other hand, has become too strict. I see lots of cards that I would grade 1-1.5 grades higher. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
My experience is the opposite. I find that PSA is definitely substandard compared to SGC. I have bought PSA 6's with corner creases and will never be burned by them again. This my opinion and my experience.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1954 banks rookie vg | Flintboy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-09-2015 01:32 PM |
| 1954 Topps Al Kaline PSA 5 1954 Topps Ernie Banks PSA 3 MC | Sean1125 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-18-2013 11:00 AM |
| WTB: 1954 Ernie Banks | SushiX37 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-28-2012 08:31 PM |
| FS 1954 Banks SGC 80 | Taxman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 09-28-2012 08:04 AM |
| FS: PSA 2 1954 Banks with NM Appearance | shagrotn77 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 07-22-2010 08:57 PM |